A bill introduced in the Legislature last week would allow what the Tacoma City Council has refused: digital billboards.
Billboard company Clear Channel is asking lawmakers to allow digital signs along Washington’s state highways. The state Senate last year voted for a similar measure, but it didn’t pass the House. This year’s bill, sponsored by Des Moines Democrat Dave Upthegrove, will start in the House. It would allow “static” signs that hold the same picture, without flashing or showing videos.
A Clear Channel lobbyist said the company is trying to replace existing traditional signs, not put up new ones. The lobbyist, Noah Reandeau, said 43 other states allow digital signs. Oregon recently joined that group, he said.
There’s sure to be debate over whether the billboards are visual blight, as opponents argue, or whether their use to law enforcement outweighs any negatives. As with the company’s Tacoma effort, supporters are emphasizing the signs would be available for Amber Alerts and other emergency messages.
The measure applies to the state highway system only, not to areas along interstates.
Electronic signs are currently not allowed and there are limits on traditional signs, which would not change under the bill: They must be permitted, and they are generally limited to industrial or commercial areas. Billboards must advertise a business within 12 miles of the sign or must be of “interest to the traveling public,” such as ads for eating, lodging or gas.
Jordan Schrader
jordan.schrader@thenewstribune.com
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.