tool name

close
tool goes here

D.C. sniper's lawyers want prosecutor off the case

Published: July 24, 2004 at 3:01 a.m. PDTUpdated: May 20, 2008 at 1:49 p.m. PDT
0 comments

FAIRFAX, VA. - Lawyers for convicted sniper John Allen Muhammad want to bar a prosecutor from putting the killer on trial again because of arguments the prosecutor made during the trial of teenage accomplice Lee Boyd Malvo.

Defense lawyers Peter Greenspun and Jonathan Shapiro said in court filings released Friday that prosecutor Robert Horan Jr. made such a strong case that Malvo acted independently of Muhammad that they want Horan as a defense witness.

Calling Horan as a witness creates an inevitable conflict that requires Horan's removal from the case, the lawyers wrote, citing Horan's words in the Malvo trial.

"You can talk about John Allen Muhammad all you want," Horan said in his closing argument to the Malvo jury. "Maybe it was his idea, but the evidence stamps this defendant as the shooter."

The motion citing Horan, the dean of Virginia prosecutors with 38 years of experience, is part of the defense team's overall contention that prosecutors have made conflicting arguments against Muhammad and Malvo when it has suited their interests.

Last year, Horan obtained a conviction against Malvo for the shooting of FBI analyst Linda Franklin, one of 10 killings that terrorized the Washington area in October 2002. The prosecutor refuted Malvo's defense that he was brainwashed by Muhammad.

Muhammad is on death row following his conviction last year for a sniper killing in neighboring Prince William County. Horan has pursued a second death penalty trial because of the possibility Muhammad's conviction could be overturned on appeal.

Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Arias lawyers take case to court of public opinion

    Jodi Arias' attorneys have tried motions for mistrials, allegations of prosecutorial misconduct, appeals to higher courts, even efforts to quit the case entirely.

  • Cries follows acquittal in death of Calif. model

    Cries and screams erupted in a Los Angeles courtroom as family and friends of an aspiring model heard a jury's verdict acquitting the 47-year-old woman accused of strangling her.

  • Jury selection under way in Stuart trial

    The trial for a Pasco woman charged with killing her mother during a fight over money got under way Tuesday with 132 potential jurors showing up in court.

    Franklin County prosecutors and the attorneys for Tashia L. Stuart will spend at least the next two days trying to seat a jury for the trial that could last up to five weeks.

    Stuart, 40, is charged with first-degree murder with aggravated circumstances and attempted first-degree murder.

  • Snipers’ story now a movie

    Few killers have terrorized more people than the Beltway Snipers.

  • Guantanamo court held in secret without accused

    Prosecutors and defense attorneys emerged Friday from a closed session of the Guantanamo war crimes court so shrouded in secrecy that the defendant was barred from the room and none of the parties could even disclose the subject of the hearing.