Our nation’s defense since World War II has been largely based on rapid deployment of air power around the globe, and aerial refueling has been an absolutely essential component.
Awarding the new tanker contract to Airbus/EADS might make some sense if technical advantages versus Boeing were the only considerations, but has the Air Force brass considered the colossal strategic risk?
For the past 50 years, U.S.-manufactured Boeing KC-135 tankers have carried most of the load well beyond their years. There is no doubt we need a new aircraft. But is this a good time to roll the dice and outsource the production of a key military asset that could tie us to the shifting political winds of France for the next 50 years?
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.