INITIATIVE 1000
The “Death with Dignity” measure modeled on Oregon’s decade-old law passed easily. That’s really not a big surprise; Washington voters have a libertarian streak that tends to favor individual rights – the same attitude that has rejected anti-abortion measures in the past.
The majority might not choose to use physician-assisted aid in dying themselves, but they don’t see why others should be denied the right to end their own lives a little earlier if they are terminally ill.
More was spent on this initiative than on any other ballot measure: $4.9 million by supporters and $1.6 million by opponents. The best arguments for the initiative were made by two former governors of Oregon, who claimed that its assisted suicide law had not been abused.
The News Tribune editorial board endorsed I-1000, but we believe it needs stronger public disclosure and mental evaluation requirements. The Legislature should closely monitor implementation of I-1000 and make any needed changes.
LAKEWOOD PROPOSITION 1
The proposed casino ban – which was badly defeated Tuesday – had an uphill climb to begin with. Few Lakewood residents live near the casinos located in commercial districts near Interstate 5 and along Pacific Highway South.
The casinos poured big money into an opposition campaign the supporters couldn’t hope to match. The measure’s fate was sealed when the city warned that if it passed, 11 police positions would be cut. Public safety was one of the main reasons residents voted to incorporate in the first place.
Even many residents who recognize the social ills of gambling likely found it hard to vote yes knowing that casino workers and city employees would lose their jobs in a bad economy.
It’s still a good idea for city officials to start shifting gambling revenues from the operating budget to one-time-only expenditures. Who knows when sagging business might force one or more of the casinos to shut down on their own, without help from voters?
PENINSULA METRO PARKS PROPOSITION 1
It was disappointing to see voters reject this important $20 million bond measure. The owner of an average home in the taxing district ($400,000 of assessed valuation) would have paid only $6 a month. It would have protected valuable open space, increased waterfront access, created recreational facilities for young and old alike, and renovated existing properties.
This was a sadly shortsighted vote by PenMet Parks residents. The district should keep trying.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.