jason.hagey@thenewstribune.com"/>

tool name

close
tool goes here

Dam deal close after most of a century

Published: Dec. 16, 2008 at 12:05 a.m. PST
0 comments

A monumental battle between Tacoma Power and the Skokomish Indian Tribe over a pair of dams the utility built on traditional tribal grounds on the Olympic Peninsula in the 1920s may be near an end.

Although both sides cautioned there is no deal yet, the Tacoma Public Utilities board of directors gave its approval last week to a motion that authorizes Director Bill Gaines to enter into a settlement agreement with the tribe. The City Council is scheduled to consider it tonight.

The proposal calls for the utility to pay the tribe $12.6 million in upfront cash and transfer 1,140 acres of Tacoma Power property to the tribe in exchange for dropping all claims left over from a $5.6 billion lawsuit.

Tacoma Power also would give the tribe 300 acres of tidelands, and make annual payments equal to 7.25 percent of the value of electricity produced by Cushman Dam No. 2 for 40 years. For the first 20 years, the payments could not be less than $300,000 or more than $500,000 per year; for the 20 years after that, they’d fall between $625,000 and $950,000 per year.

Officials hope to have a completed settlement soon, but the city and tribe have had a rocky relationship for years, and Tacoma Power officials were nervous that any publicity about the possible settlement might cause it to unravel.

The settlement is contingent on Tacoma Power receiving a 40-year license from the federal government to operate the hydroelectric project. The city’s attempt to relicense the project dates to 1974, when the original license expired. The new license has been held up in a legal battle before federal regulators and in the courts.

Several other federal agencies also need to sign on before it’s complete. “It’s not a done deal,” said Pat McCarty, a generation manager with Tacoma Power.

Mason Morisset, an attorney for the tribe, told The News Tribune that talks between the parties are “cordial” and “productive,” but they are “not there yet.”

The Cushman Project was Tacoma’s first major hydroelectric project, but the Skokomish Tribe has opposed it from the start. The first dam, completed in 1926, created Lake Cushman, and the second dam, completed four years later, created the smaller Lake Kokanee.

Electricity from the dams is carried 40 miles to Tacoma, and crosses the Narrows on cables strung near the Narrows bridge. The project produces enough power to serve approximately 25,000 homes.

A crowd of 5,000 gathered at the base of the Tacoma towers in 1926 to celebrate the completion, and President Calvin Coolidge pressed a telegraph button in Washington, D.C., that started current flowing through the lines, according to newspaper accounts.

The tribe filed its first lawsuit over the project in 1930, maintaining that by diverting the Skokomish River, the project would ruin the salmon fishery and the tribe’s fishing rights.

By the early 1990s, the tribe was threatening to push for the removal of the dams. A few years later, the city said it might have to shut down operations because the terms of a new license made it too expensive.

The tribe filed a new lawsuit against Tacoma and the federal government in 1999, claiming the Cushman project wiped out treaty-protected fishing and hunting grounds, and had unlawfully enriched the City of Tacoma for decades.

Cushman Dam No. 2 has at times either completely or nearly completely diverted the flow of the North Fork of the Skokomish River.

The lawsuit claimed $5.6 billion in damages dating to the construction of the dams.

Tacoma Power officials insisted they broke no laws and complied with the operating license. The city succeeded in getting the claims dropped, and the case appeared dead in 2006 when the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the tribe’s appeal.

But the tribe revived the case by repackaging it under federal common law claims in federal district court. The two sides then agreed to enter into mediation.

Laura Fox, a TPU board member, said the dollar amounts in the possible settlement are large, but they aren’t nearly as daunting as either the original $5.8 billion figure or the possibility of losing the electricity from the project.

“We definitely all feel a sigh of relief,” Fox said. “It’s really pretty amazing.”

Jason Hagey: 253-597-8542

blogs.thenewstribune.com/politics

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • In late 1929, Tacoma had no electricity; the USS Lexington brought the power

    In December of 1929, the water levels behind Tacoma’s dams were at frightening lows and falling due to lack of rain, rivers and creeks feeding the reservoirs were freezing up, and there was a very real danger of ice being sucked into the dams' turbines. The city’s electricity was slashed immediately.

  • U.S., Canada to reconsider treaty governing Columbia River

    The treaty created a massive system of dams for flood control and electricity for the Northwest, but changing weather now might mean fewer fish and might damage the river’s ability to feed the turbines that have produced billions of dollars’ worth of hydropower for both nations.

  • Norm Dicks' decades in Congress brought a lot of money back to home state

    Norm Dicks is a master of the earmark, congressionally steered funding that was once a badge of honor but has become, Pentagon chief Leon Panetta said, an unfair symbol of government waste and pork-barrel spending. Dicks’ retirement Jan. 2 will further thin the ranks of an already vanishing breed: lawmakers who work together across party lines and view bringing home federal largess as a key part of their core duty to help their districts and their states.

  • Studies mull impact of closing nuclear plant

    Washington and Oregon chapters of Physicians for Social Responsibility have commissioned an economic study of the possibility of shutting down the nuclear power plant near Richland.

    The low cost of power in the Mid-Columbia could mean that power produced by the plant could be replaced economically if Energy Northwest's Columbia Generating Station retired early, according to the group. The plant's license was approved last year to operate through 2043.

    However, Bonneville Power Administration and Energy Northwest said a study they are conducting of a temporary or permanent shutdown of the plant shows that would increase the cost of power for the region.

  • Studies mull impact of closing nuclear power plant near Richland

    The low cost of power in the Mid-Columbia could mean that power produced by the plant could be replaced economically if Energy Northwest’s Columbia Generating Station retired early, according to Physicians for Social Responsibility. The plant’s license was approved last year to operate through 2043.