Recognizing a tough budget situation, the state is planning to pursue a less aggressive plan to curb climate change than many had hoped.
The centerpiece of the plan is a regional cap-and-trade system that would limit the amount of greenhouse gases that industrial polluters emit while allowing them to buy and trade credits so that they can produce more.
But some of the ambitious recommendations put forth by a task force that Gov. Chris Gregoire convened last year likely won’t be pursued when the Legislature convenes next month.
Gregoire last week released a pared-down state budget proposal in response to a projected deficit of nearly $6 billion, with calls for across-the-board cuts in areas such as higher education and human services.
“We’ll do as much as we can within the confines of the budget,” said Tony Usibelli, assistant director of the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development. “That’s the difficulty wer’e running up against.”
A report released Monday by several state agencies relies heavily on a regional cap-and-trade program to fight climate change.
Concerned about the bad economy and pressure on businesses, Gregoire is leaning toward giving away most of the pollution credits, rather than auctioning them off as environmentalists had hoped.
The governor’s proposed budget includes about $25 million for climate change, including money to add solar panels to three state prisons, increase the energy efficiency of public buildings and fund anaerobic digesters to reduce waste. There’s also money in the budget to increase vanpools.
The Climate Action Team, which Gregoire convened last year to come up with concrete ways to fight climate change, earlier this month called for more energy-efficient buildings, compact urban development, better collection of recycled materials, reduced driving and revised development rules to account for greenhouse gas emissions.
Janice Adair of the state Department of Ecology said the state won’t pursue some of those recommendations next year, such as giving tax credits to buildings that reduce energy use.
She said other groups or legislators may push for them, and some efforts, such as revising the energy code to reduce energy use, can still be done.
Some environmentalists say they understand the situation.
“It’s obviously a dismal budget situation,” said K.C. Golden, policy director with Climate Solutions. “We’re not expecting enormous public investment.”
He said there’s opportunity for private investment in energy-efficient buildings and through the cap-and-trade program.
Washington is one of seven states and four Canadian provinces that drafted a plan for a regional cap-and-trade market.
The plan initially calls for selling at least 10 percent of credits to polluters through an auction and giving away the rest.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.