tool name

close
tool goes here

Stop signs are clear at telling people what to do

Tuesday’s dust-up over sign code enforcement demonstrated the simmering tension between the Pierce County Council and the executive branch. It also showed how two little words made a different between enforcing and not enforcing the sign law.

Published: 06/04/09 12:05 am
0 comments

Tuesday’s dust-up over sign code enforcement demonstrated the simmering tension between the Pierce County Council and the executive branch. It also showed how two little words made a different between enforcing and not enforcing the sign law.

When it approved this year’s budget, the council included a provision that set aside $100,000 in the county road fund for removing illegal signs from public rights of way. The provision is worded this way: “Provided up to $100,000 of this appropriation shall be used by the Public Works and Utilities Department to operate a countywide sign enforcement and abatement project ... .” (italics are mine).

Those two words – “up to” – constitute one front in the ongoing tussle between the county’s legislative and executive branches over budget control. They permit the public works department to spend $100,000 on sign code enforcement. But public works director Brian Ziegler contends nothing in the language requires the department to spend that amount on sign enforcement. The way Ziegler sees it, the department can spend less (or nothing) on sign enforcement. It just can’t spend more.

County departments have used that wiggle room with other budget line items as revenue dries up and they need to hoard cash. But the council could be getting wise, at least when it comes to the illegal signs provision.

At Tuesday’s committee meeting, Councilman Shawn Bunney, R-Lake Tapps, asked Ziegler how the council might word the provision differently to ensure the money is spent on sign enforcement.

Ziegler said the council might use the words “at least” instead of “up to” to strengthen the provision. That would require the department to spend a minimum amount on sign enforcement.

“It’s a small nuance,” Ziegler said. ...

David Wickert, The News Tribune

Similar stories:

  • Beautification spending questioned

  • Pierce County snow, ice removal costs $500K, puts dent in budget

  • Whatcom council debating whether to join watershed-planning program

  • Property, sales taxes help Connell maintain services

  • Tacoma's three-day interview process for city manager begins

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

The News Tribune had 69,877 visitors yesterday
South Sound Cars .com
VIEW ALL »

Presented By
Car Pros

2010 Chevrolet Cobalt LT
Red color, 35,660 miles
$13,288.00

South Sound Homes .com
VIEW ALL »

Homes By
Windermere Real Estate

LUXURY CUSTOMS NOW READY
Four residences with fine upgrades and detail in Historic Steilacoom/new prices!

South Sound Rentals .com
VIEW ALL »

13 Colonies

55+ community
This community is located across from Tacoma Community College, and is close to shopping, restaurants, theatres and Narrows

TribBits
GridIron Hits 2011/12 - Football Picks
Local prizes sponsored by Korum Puyallup Nissan
Subscribe to The News Tribune
Click Here to Subscribe
GridIron Hits 2011/12 Subscribe to The News Tribune