Re: “Fish counts show dam removal isn’t needed” (letter, 7-12).
The writer claims that Snake River salmon and steelhead are doing just fine. His conclusion is based on fish counts at Bonneville Dam, the first dam encountered by returning adult salmon in the Columbia-Snake River system.
There are two big problems with using generic Bonneville fish counts to assess the health of Snake River salmon far upstream.
First, the numbers include both hatchery and wild salmon, when wild fish – the ones needed to sustain healthy salmon runs over the long-term – comprise only about 20 percent of Snake River spring/summer chinook returns.
Second, the writer ignores the fact that eight dams up the system at Lower Granite Dam, wild spring/summer chinook returns over the last few years have been no better than when the fish were first listed as “threatened” in the early 1990s. Treading water should not be confused with sustainable recovery.
Even Sen. Mike Crapo, a conservative Idaho Republican, is now calling for including removal of the four lower Snake River dams in negotiations over how to manage the Snake River to meet the needs of inland Northwest communities and salmon. The Obama administration and Washington’s congressional delegation should follow Crapo’s lead. (Garrity is Washington conservation director of American Rivers.)
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.