It’s that scary time of year again: Strangely dressed characters ringing your doorbell, phantom phone calls at all hours, pranksters pulling juvenile tricks on each other. Yes, Election Day is almost here. To keep up with the latest campaign scuttlebutt, check out The News Tribune’s Political Buzz blog at blog.thenewstribune.com/politics. Here are some recent posts from the blog.
How would I-1033 impact Tacoma?
That was the basic question underlying a presentation given by city finance director Bob Biles to Tacoma City Council members at Tueday’s noon study session.
Part of I-1033, the Tim Eyman-sponsored statewide measure on this year’s ballot, seeks to cap revenues deposited into city and county spending plans based on changes in population and inflation. Any additional revenues would be put into a “Lower Property Taxes Account” used to reduce property taxes.
The long and short of Biles’ presentation? It depends.
“I cannot possibly forecast what our (population and inflation) growth will be,” Biles said. “But again, I think you see the impacts ... could be fairly significant.”
Biles provided estimated ranges based on historic growth trends of the measure’s potential “six-year impact” to the city’s budgets. The estimates ranged from losing about $10 million in revenues over that span during low-growth periods (+2.5 percent), to losses of $161 million during periods of high growth (+6 percent).
Based on calculations of the city’s average inflation and population growth trends over the past 13 years (+2.7 percent), Biles added it would take until 2012 before the city’s General Fund revenues would return to 2007 levels (about $206 million – the high point in city budget revenues from 2005 to 2009).
The discussion over 1033 led to much confusion as to how the measure will (or will it?) affect previous voter-approved levies, including previously past bond issues in Tacoma for Emergency Medical Services and city police headquarters. Council members, the city attorney, the city manager and Biles invariably took turns offering their analysis of what potential impacts to previously approved levies would be, though no firm conclusion was drawn.
“The conversation you’re having right now is a good indication of the confusion and the lack of clarity of this initiative,” City manager Eric Anderson said.
Lewis Kamb, The News Tribune
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.