tool name

close
tool goes here

Seattle's solution to empty convention center? Expand

Normally you would have to rely on opponents of sports stadiums and convention centers to expose the myth that they boost local economies.

Published: Feb. 27, 2011 at 12:05 a.m. PST
0 comments

Normally you would have to rely on opponents of sports stadiums and convention centers to expose the myth that they boost local economies.

This year it’s the backers of a bill under consideration in the state House of Representatives who are doing that work (inadvertently … I think).

Remember hearing how stadiums are a sure way to spur economic development in the downtown neighborhoods they share? You know, restaurants and bars and nightlife?

Then there’s the sales pitch that investing tax dollars in convention centers is great economic development, getting out-of-towners to drop their cash in your cash registers to create hundreds – if not thousands – of great jobs.

House Bill 1997 involves a batch of taxes now being used to pay off debt for the Kingdome, Safeco Field and Qwest Field. Once the stadiums are paid off – Safeco this summer, the Kingdome in 2015 and Qwest in 2020 – some King County-only taxes on hotel rooms, rental cars and restaurant tabs would go toward different things.

“Workforce” housing. Programs to help the neighborhoods surrounding the stadiums. Culture and historic organizations. An expansion of the state convention center in Seattle. All would split up $467 million over the next 25 years.

Only the arts has been a recipient of stadium tax revenue up until now. But its share of some Kingdome hotel-motel tax revenue gets shifted to Qwest Field next year.

But why does Pioneer Square and the International District need a special boost of $1 million a year? Haven’t those neighborhoods benefited from all those fans going to and from Safeco and Qwest?

Apparently not. The stadiums are designed to capture as much fan money as possible. The neighborhoods settle for a trickle in return for enduring crowds, noise, parking problems and litter.

Putting $5 million a year into low-income housing sheds light on a dirty little secret of the hospitality industry. Many of the jobs created are so poorly paid that those holding them need food and housing subsidies.

So why would the state promote an expansion of the convention center to create jobs it must then subsidize? Once again, politics trumps economics. Expansions are backed by construction labor unions whose members want the well-paid but temporary jobs. Downtown business owners, especially hotels, also support the expansion.

Backers, led by King County Executive Dow Constantine, say the center frequently turns away business when the building is already booked. Having enough space to accommodate two or even three conventions at a time assures that won’t happen, promoters and their consultants say.

But while there surely are such scheduling conflicts (though they’re always overstated), Seattle suffers from too little business, not too much. That is something it shares with every other convention city in the nation.

In 1997, the Seattle facility drew 184,000 out-of-state visitors. These are the ones who rent rooms and eat in restaurants – the supposed economic purpose of convention centers. In 2009, despite an earlier expansion designed to allow more than one convention at a time, attendance fell to 140,000. Last year it fell again to 85,000.

The recession gets some of the blame. But market share was already dropping before the economic collapse. That’s because so many cities have built or expanded convention centers that there is a unfillable glut. It will remain unfillable once the recession ends.

Safeco Field is nearly always sold out for opening day and for the Yankees and Red Sox. Does that make it too small? Should it be expanded to capture this “lost revenue”? Probably not, since building to the maximum possible demand would be very expensive and capture only incremental additions in revenue. In the meantime the oversupply of seats – empty for most other games – would hurt the team’s finances in the long run.

Only in the tax-supported convention center business do managers and consultants think the solution to a shortage of demand is to create even more supply.

All to create permanent jobs that require permanent subsidies.

Peter Callaghan: 253-597-8657 peter.callaghan@thenewstribune.com blog.thenewstribune.com/politics

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Bieter a 'puppet master' of auditorium board?

    Some think the mayor's motive is baseball. Control of millions of dollars is at stake.

  • Eastside route best option for Link for many reasons

    Re: Expansion of Tacoma Link light rail.

  • Visitor bureau supports closure of Vista Field

    Redeveloping the Vista Field Airport is the best option for Tri-Cities' tourism industry, the Tri-Cities Visitor & Convention Bureau told the Port of Kennewick on Wednesday.

    The visitor bureau's board sent a letter to the port in support of closing and redeveloping the small general aviation airport near the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick.

    The visitor bureau also is asking the port to make the decision about the airport's future instead of spending more money to put it to a public vote.

  • U.S. taxpayers are ponying up $154M for new Huskies stadium

    The University of Washington began contemplating renovation of its crumbling 92-year-old football stadium a half-dozen years ago. One financing idea — getting $150 million from Seattle-area taxpayers — ran afoul of State Rep. Ross Hunter. The state was reducing college funding, and tuition was surging.

  • Enhancing Vista Field Airport would raise Port of Kennewick property taxes

    Keeping Kennewick's Vista Field Airport flying would require Port of Kennewick voters to agree to raise their property taxes.

    Port officials told the Herald that the port's levy rate most likely would need to double to afford the increased operating losses and the $42.6 million cost of improving the small general aviation airport near the Three Rivers Convention Center.

    The port has been struggling to find a way to revitalize the 90-acre airfield after deciding two years ago to keep the airport open in hopes of recruiting more businesses.