tool name

close
tool goes here

Allocation of school funding could improve

Washington state school districts could do a better job getting more of the $12 billion spent each year on education into classrooms, where it will make the most difference, a new state audit said.

Published: June 8, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

Washington state school districts could do a better job getting more of the $12 billion spent each year on education into classrooms, where it will make the most difference, a new state audit said.

The performance audit released Wednesday included detailed comparisons among school districts of similar size, as well as suggestions about how some are spending more money in the classroom than others.

The audit noted that moving just 1 percent of school spending from administrative offices to the classroom would be enough to pay for more than 1,000 teachers statewide.

Among the cost-saving suggestions were: Buy fuel for school buses in bulk, use more USDA surplus food in the lunchroom, and look at having some services provided by the private sector.

It also suggests cutting staffing dollars by making such changes as hiring licensed practical nurses instead of registered nurses for school infirmaries, sharing costs with neighboring districts, and contracting with the state or education service districts for some things.

Although many of the cost differences among districts involve choices, some are not, such as how many special education students they serve.

The state auditor decided to do this performance review because taking a closer look at education spending has been repeatedly identified by citizens and lawmakers as a high priority, said department spokeswoman Mindy Chambers. About 43 percent of the state budget is spent on K-12 education.

Auditor Brian Sonntag wanted the report to be practical for school districts and informative for lawmakers, while not trying to offer a one-size-fits-all approach, Chambers said.

The audit dings state school officials for overstating how much money is spent on classroom instruction by adding in a second number called teaching support.

The approach implies Washington spends 70 percent of school dollars in the classroom, which would be more than any other state in the nation. The federal government paints a different picture.

Washington and 11 other states spent about 60 percent of school dollars in classrooms, according to a 2009 comparison by the National Center for Education Statistics. Another 18 states spent more and 20 spent less. Washington’s numbers have improved slightly since then, but no more recent national comparisons are available.

The rest of the money goes to transportation, food, nursing, counseling, outside help for special education students, administration and a variety of central district office functions.

The audit recommends the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction improve its transparency by taking the federal approach and use just the dollars that pay for teaching when it reports expenditures for classroom instruction.

Superintendent of Public Instruction Randy Dorn responded to that section of the audit by saying the office was already doing this on some reports and would look into changing others.

The audit also urged the office to maintain the database the auditor’s office created for the purpose of the study, saying it would help districts save more money if they could continue to see their operations compared to their peers.

Dorn said he would discuss the idea with his department’s data management committee and see if they think it would be worthwhile to find the money to keep track of this information.

School reform advocate Liv Finne commended the auditor’s report for its wealth of information and practical advice for school districts.

Digging a little deeper can reveal a lot about the choices individual school districts are making, said Finne, director of the Center for Education at the Washington Policy Center.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Audit scrutinizes $260,000 in special education funding in Kiona-Benton City School District

    State auditors say the Kiona-Benton City School District received about $260,000 last school year for special education students that district administrators can't prove were enrolled.

    The Washington Auditor's Office reported the finding in an audit released this week. The bulk of the money -- $231,460 -- came from the state and the rest from the federal government.

    State officials said the district will have to go through an audit resolution, a process that could require Ki-Be to pay back some of the money if it can't show that students were served.

  • Audit affirms Steilacoom school error

    A new report issued Monday by the Washington State Auditor’s Office says the Steilacoom Historical School District was overpaid nearly $1 million over two years because it overcounted enrollment in its online program.

  • State Auditor’s Office posts Steilacoom schools report, then pulls it

    The state Auditor’s Office issued a finding Monday against the Steilacoom Historical School District and, in an unusual move, rescinded it hours later while it takes another look at past student enrollment in online programs.

  • Report: Too many teachers, too little quality

    The nation's teacher-training programs do not adequately prepare would-be educators for the classroom, even as they produce almost triple the number of graduates needed, according to a survey of more than 1,000 programs released Tuesday.

  • Superintendent Dorn has been wrong a lot lately

    Randy Dorn, the state superintendent of public instruction, has been wrong a lot lately. I first noticed this when he offered his ideal education budget. Dorn proposed what he claimed was required by the state Supreme Court ruling on education funding, but he cherry-picked some expenditures, added some new spending of keen interest to the union he used to work for and recommended no policy reforms suggested by the court ruling.