tool name

close
tool goes here

Many courts need a refresher on open records rights

Location seems to be a key factor in determining whether citizens can successfully obtain public records they’re entitled to by state law.

Published: June 13, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

Location seems to be a key factor in determining whether citizens can successfully obtain public records they’re entitled to by state law.

At least that what News Tribune reporter Sean Robinson discovered when he requested public documents regarding cases adjudicated in 22 district and municipal courts in the South Sound.

The cases were routine ones that Robinson knew should be made available under state open records law – for free. He asked for the documents as a private citizen to see how the courts’ staffs would respond.

Those responses were all over the map. Hats off to the ones that provided the requested documents in timely fashion: Pierce County District Court and municipal courts in Tacoma, Puyallup, Federal Way, Olympia, Gig Harbor, Buckley and Fife.

Six municipal courts wouldn’t hand over case documents: Lakewood, Fircrest, Sumner, Yelm, Eatonville and Wilkeson. Other courts told him to make an appointment for a later date (Thurston County District Court and municipal courts in Auburn, Milton and Bonney Lake), or they removed significant portions of records (municipal courts in Orting, Roy, Steilacoom and Ruston).

The less-than-forthcoming reactions show that more education needs to be done with court staff – especially those in smaller jurisdictions – to remind them of citizens’ rights to public records. When new employees are hired, it should be impressed on them that their first responsibility is to the public, not to judges, court administrators, lawyers, prosecutors or defendants.

Small-town courts may have the excuse of lack of staff or resources. Larger ones – like Lakewood – don’t. The municipal court employee in the county’s second-largest city apparently was unaware that the court was legally obliged to promptly comply with Robinson’s simple request. Instead, the reporter was given a records request form and told that the court administrator would have to handle it. However, that person wasn’t there.

To that court’s credit, it has since revised its policy. But courts shouldn’t have to be schooled in their legal obligations by a reporter. Defendants are told that ignorance of the law is no excuse; that holds true for the courts as well.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • We believe in open government in all contexts

    Today is a holiday as patriotic as the Fourth of July. It is Sunshine Sunday and the beginning of Sunshine Week, both of which promote open government.

  • Promises made, some promises kept

    In the wake of the David Brame scandal 10 years ago, Tacoma city leaders, police officials and community members proposed changes and made promises to ensure that nothing similar happened again in Tacoma.

  • WikiLeaks case file fight moves to federal court

    The WikiLeaks organization and a handful of journalists asked a federal judge Wednesday to order greater transparency in the court-martial of an Army private who has acknowledged sending reams of classified document to the WikiLeaks website.

  • Dancers ask judge to keep files private

    Spearheaded by one dancer’s request, a group of more than 200 dancers for a Parkland strip club wants a judge to prevent the disclosure of their names, addresses and phone numbers to a Pierce County Jail inmate.

  • Pasco backs bill seeking outside review of public records requests

    PASCO -- Pasco officials say an increasing number of large public records requests are eating up staff time and taxpayer dollars, and the city has no recourse to complain that a request is made to harass the city or tie up resources.

    City Manager Gary Crutchfield said the city would like to have an option for an independent reviewer to decide when a request is intended to be abusive, and to allow for an injunction when it's determined a request is intended as punitive.

    "Right now there is no referee," he said. "It's like playing a game of basketball with no referee, and the other guy is getting pretty physical."