tool name

close
tool goes here

New Puyallup City Council kills development/preservation plan

The City of Puyallup is scuttling a project once billed as a way to boost economic development down­town and preserve farms, forests and other environmentally sensitive lands.

Published: June 27, 2012 at 9:00 p.m. PDT
0 comments

The City of Puyallup is scuttling a project once billed as a way to boost economic development down­town and preserve farms, forests and other environmentally sensitive lands.

The City Council last week halted work on “Cultivating Puyallup,” a roughly 1½-year-old planning project.

The vote reverses action previously taken by the seven-member council. In November 2010, members unanimously agreed to accept a pair of grants to pay for the work.

But the council has four new members this year, and some of them balked at the possibility of a transfer of development rights (TDR) program – a concept that was being studied as part of the initiative. Some of the council’s veteran members also had a change of heart about the project.

Deputy Mayor John Knutsen, who took office in 2008, said the city already has the ability to protect farmland through zoning. And, he said, his constituents made it clear they worried about the effect of a TDR program on downtown.

“I’ve heard and seen enough to know I’m not going to support it,” he said.

Four other council members – Rick Hansen, Tom Swanson, Steve Vermillion and John Hopkins – voted with Knutsen to end the planning project, while council members John Palmer and Kent Boyle wanted to continue. Boyle has been on the council since January 2010; Palmer joined this year.

Palmer said TDR was “something worth investigating” in Puyallup, and allowing the planning project to wrap up wouldn’t have required the city to ultimately implement a program.

“Canceling (it) just takes all that work that was done and puts it on the shelf,” he said. “There’s no harm in proceeding.”

TDR is a concept that shifts development away from farms and other natural areas. In general, developers pay for the right to build on those properties, but don’t actually put up apartments, condos or similar projects there. Instead, they get bonuses – such as greater building heights – in so-called “receiving areas” that are deemed better for urban growth.

In Puyallup, officials were focusing on downtown as a receiving area.

Hopkins said he worried that would pose a further threat to the historic downtown. And the lands preserved wouldn’t necessarily fall within the city, he said, adding that he also had concerns about how the program would be administered.

Palmer said he feels the city could have provided bonuses through a TDR program that were in keeping with the scale of the city, and perhaps protected some farmland and resource areas, “which is hard to do.”

The Cultivating Puyallup project didn’t focus solely on TDR. It also involved a comprehensive environmental review of future development downtown, intended to expedite the permit process for individual development projects.

The council in general seemed more supportive of that piece, but didn’t have the option of stopping only the TDR work.

A Seattle-based consulting firm was helping with the project, which was set to wrap up by next March. Grants totaling $219,000 paid for most of the work. The city also paid $25,000 in matching money and contributed staff time, city officials said.

The city doesn’t have to pay back the grant money that’s already been spent, the officials said.

sara.schilling@thenewstribune.com
253-552-7058
blog.thenewstribune.com/street
@TNTschilling

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • University Place considers tax incentives to help boost Town Center

    Officials in University Place are weighing whether to give up property tax revenue for nearly a decade as part of a deal with developers that would keep construction activity humming at the city’s slow-moving Town Center.

  • Council tables $10 million grant

    In 2005, the City of Puyallup annexed 1.1 acres known as the Neeley Annexation Area that included the Milwaukee Bridge located on Milwaukee Avenue Northeast and 5th Street Northeast.

  • Sound Transit agrees to consider satellite parking

    The Puyallup City Council and Sound Transit staff and board members culminated a three-part series of meetings last week and came up with a list of options to improve access to the downtown Sounder train station.

  • Puyallup City Council members push for satellite parking for Sound Transit

    Puyallup City Council and Sound Transit board members and staff joined for the second of three scheduled meetings last week to discuss options for better access to Puyallup’s Sound Transit station.

  • Waterfront's impact on downtown Bellingham could be issue

    BELLINGHAM - The negative impacts of a booming waterfront on downtown businesses is emerging as a concern as waterfront redevelopment plans get public scrutiny.

    At a Thursday, May 9, session of the Bellingham Planning Commission, some commissioners said waterfront businesspeople have expressed fears about how a revitalized waterfront would affect them.

    "They are in fact worried that the city is turning a shoulder to downtown in favor of this new, glitzy project," said Planning Commission Chairman Tom Grinstad, an architect.