tool name

close
tool goes here

New state, federal roll-your-own regulations will do more harm than good

This is a story about big business vs. small.

Published: July 6, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

This is a story about big business vs. small.

I am a small-business owner of a roll-your-own (RYO) store in Seattle. Along with 64 other operators across Washington, I pay state sales, employment and B&O taxes. Together, we employ 250 people in communities that need our jobs, and we purchase local goods and services that contribute to keeping this struggling economy pressing forward.

In the past few weeks, there has been a great deal of press regarding our businesses in this state. The state wants to “reclassify” our stores as cigarette manufacturers (currently we offer pipe tobacco, tubes and machine rental); in effect, this will create an opportunity for new state tax revenue.

This debate boils down to market share and profits. If these laws are passed, classifying our businesses as cigarette manufacturers will make them untenable.

At the state level, much of the criticism has been made of “tax avoidance” by our customers and a missed opportunity for tax collection from the stores. This means more than adding an additional $20 state tax stamp to all of our smokes.

The state wants to require that we purchase cigarette tobacco from a single, state-approved vendor at three times our current cost. According to court documents, the state Department of Revenue and the Liquor Control Board estimate that they are losing between $32,000 and $150,000 per day in cigarette taxes from our stores. Those departments maintain that “consumers ... are currently simply evading the tax.”

Will the state collect additional revenue? No. The stores will close, and Washington state will lose taxes that the RYO stores have been paying and force our employees to file for unemployment.

At the federal level, Section 100122 of the Highway Bill is an arbitrary and immediate reclassification of small retail tobacco shops. This provision for RYO stores to become “cigarette manufacturers” will force all 1,200 businesses – which have more than 10,000 employees nationwide – to close indefinitely.

It was inserted into the bill by Republican U.S. Rep. Eric Cantor, House majority leader from Virginia, home of powerhouse tobacco and cigarette producer, Phillip Morris. The anti-RYO provision in a bill that will assuredly be signed is no coincidence.

RYO stores have steadily grown in the past two years; we’ve gained new customers who want to make their own smokes and we’ve increased locations across the country. We threaten the market share and profits of Big Tobacco, even though we will never be able to compete (and we don’t want to) with their powerful manufacturers and lobbyists.

What will happen, if President Barack Obama does not issue a “signing statement” on this portion of the bill, will ultimately send thousands to the unemployment lines. This is not going to be a tax bonanza, but rather a drain on already stretched state budgets across the U.S.

While we can all argue about taxes, and who is and who is not paying their fair share, at the very core of this issue is the threat from RYO stores and market share shrinkage for Big Tobacco. If these misguided changes are made against our small businesses, many more of us will lose than win.

Paul Gruman owns Tobacco Joe’s Rainier in Seattle.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Will cigarette makers jump into pot market?

    SPOKANE – Will the Marlboro Man light up a joint soon?

  • Independent Tri-Cities liquor store faces closure because of state fees

    Independent liquor stores that opened after the state handed the reins of liquor sales to private companies seven months ago already are facing the threat of closure.

    New state fees on spirits have cut into the bottom line of small-business owners and increased prices. Many potential Tri-Cities customers are driving to Oregon for cheaper booze.

    At the same time, big box stores such as Costco are eligible for quantity discounts under Initiative 1183 that smaller stores don't qualify for, making it harder to compete with chain grocery stores and pharmacies.

  • The liquor store hangover

    Early this year when the state put its network of liquor stores on the auction block, many small-business people saw it as their path to prosperity. Now, six months after liquor sales were privatized, many of those once-eager bidders, who collectively paid the state more than $31 million for the rights to the state’s former stores, have discovered their adventures in retailing are a road to ruination.

  • We must get it right on implementation of legal marijuana

    In the 2012 election, voters took a historic step towards changing the war on drugs in Washington state in regards to marijuana. As the Liquor Control Board began to examine how to implement this new system, some advocates have said that Washington needs to do this right, and quickly.

  • Va. entrepreneur caught in growing political drama

    When Jonnie R. Williams believed he had discovered a way to make tobacco less harmful, the Virginia car salesman-turned-entrepreneur tried to sell his method to anyone who would listen.