tool name

close
tool goes here

The thankless, high-profile lot of being America's first lady

Not surprisingly, Barbara Bush said it most succinctly: “The first lady is going to be criticized no matter what she does.”

Published: Aug. 5, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

Not surprisingly, Barbara Bush said it most succinctly: “The first lady is going to be criticized no matter what she does.”

And how.

One needn’t prod Michelle Obama for confirmation – or most any other first lady in history. There is no “just right” in this, shall we say, “Goldilockean Proviso.” Anything is either too much or too little.

A review of first lady comments posted on The National First Ladies’ Library website (firstladies.org/biographies) confirms the difficulties faced by the presidents.’ wives. A common thread suggests that more than a few disliked the role but accepted it as a duty.

Mary Todd Lincoln, politically sophisticated and well-read, left little to speculation: “I do not belong to the public; my character is wholly domestic, and the public have nothing to do with it.” Others further down the line were unapologetic in their contempt for the mixed blessing of first lady, including Bess Truman, who said: “We are not any one of us happy to be where we are but there’s nothing to be done about it except to do our best – and forget about the sacrifices and many unpleasant things that bob up.”

Thus, anyone who criticized Obama for saying she sometimes fantasizes that she’ll “walk right out the front door and just keep walking” doesn’t know much about first lady history. They were invariably tough, smart women who sought to find a way to reconcile their own true selves with the demands of public expectation. Like Obama, all longed for the privacy to just be oneself.

In recent years, as politics have become more broadly partisan and women have assumed more prominent roles, first ladies have become fairer game in the public square. Hillary Clinton infamously set off bonfires of inanities with her now innocuous-sounding remark that she was not “some little woman, standing by my man like Tammy Wynette.” Or that she wasn’t one to stay home and bake cookies.

Au contraire, as it turns out. Hillary could teach Tammy a thing or two about family loyalty, and she was hardly the first to eschew the kitchen. Sarah Polk proclaimed in the mid-1800s: “If I get into the White House, I will neither keep house nor make butter.”

Obama, though she holds a law degree from Harvard, has turned away from Clinton’s ambitious example and focused instead on the ultimate in domesticity – not just cooking but raising the food that goes to table. Her new cookbook, “American Grown,” features glossy photos and a personal diary of gardening in the city, albeit in the nation’s best yard with significant staff help.

But even such a noble quest – to make the nation healthier and more aware of nutrition – is not without controversy. Friday’s Washington Post featured comments from fans and critics of the first lady’s gardening platform. Some don’t like her suggestion that consumers buy locally, insisting that Big Agri feeds the world and is unjustly maligned.

Undoubtedly, mass-produced food is a boon to the hungry, but buying a few tomatoes at the local farmers market is hardly an indictment of corn subsidies. Eating locally grown produce in season is a basic tenet of healthy eating, whether you’re a disciple of macrobiotics or California Cuisine.

Others are critical of Obama’s choice to focus on uber-domestic issues rather than directing her intellect and education on “more important” issues. Begging to differ, there is nothing more important than food – how we raise it, how we distribute it, and how we consume it. At a time of rampant obesity, especially among children, nutrition should be a national priority.

Tracking first ladies through history is a tour of women’s development from disenfranchised chattel to champions of choice that also offers a glimpse into how conflicted we remain about women’s proper role. What upsets so many in Barack Obama’s own political camp is that this first lady has so vividly chosen family over career, finding expression in the most elemental of endeavors – digging her hands into Mother Earth and offering nourishment to her young.

Such an explicit embrace of a traditional female role is nothing short of heresy to some. In fact, it is a brave stance by a wise woman whose priorities deserve to be celebrated.

There will be plenty of time for career and Big Issues beyond the family table once the children are grown – a lesson best learned sooner than too late.

Kathleen Parker is a Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post columnist. Email her at kathleenparker@ washpost.com.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Running for president would be a destiny fulfilled for Clinton

    No matter what Barack Obama does, he cannot escape the shadow of his former political opponent.

  • Like Cindy Lauper said: First ladies just wanna have fun

    If second-term presidents feel liberated by re-election to pursue bolder agendas, first ladies often become more comfortable to be their own person.

  • Analysts: Hillary Clinton’s record as top U.S. diplomat falls far short of greatness

    When Hillary Clinton joined the Obama administration’s famed “team of rivals,” political observers were abuzz with the possibilities of a secretary of state who was already a powerful global celebrity, a former first lady, and a hardened presidential candidate. Despite the star power and political savvy, however, analysts four years later say they can’t identify an enduring diplomatic approach that would add her to the list of the all-time greatest secretaries of state.

  • Syria poses challenge for new US envoy at UN

    Fiery human rights advocate Samantha Power has famously taken presidents to task for refusing to use military force to stop genocide. But as the U.S. ambassador to the U.N., Power may need to bite her tongue as the Obama administration resists being drawn into Syria.

  • Best way to Obama job? Support his opponent

    Former Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire may still get asked to serve in President Obama’s administration. But if the call doesn’t come, she has no one to blame but herself.