tool name

close
tool goes here

Bethel schools challenge state land-use decision

The Bethel School District is challenging a state ruling that blocks the district from building a high school on an 80-acre site it owns in the Graham area.

Published: Aug. 6, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

The Bethel School District is challenging a state ruling that blocks the district from building a high school on an 80-acre site it owns in the Graham area.

The school district calls its plan “land banking” for future growth and says the proposed school – its fourth comprehensive high school – wouldn’t be built for another 15 to 20 years.

The district says the Growth Management Hearings Board erred last month in its decision that thwarted a land-use change allowing for a new high school. The district asked the board to reconsider its ruling and allow the school.

The hearings board said it will decide by Aug. 20.

In a complex ruling, the hearings board said the school would be located on a rural site serving urban students in violation of community plans and policies for Pierce County.

“The Graham community is largely rural, and the Graham community plan describes steps to be taken to protect rural character and enhance the rural lifestyle,” the board said.

The board also said planning policies and community plans “require the county to engage with school districts in planning for school locations.”

“It is not enough to say the county will impose conditions on a school district’s subsequent permit application,” the ruling continued.

Last October, the Pierce County Council amended it comprehensive plan, redesignating 117 acres in the Graham area from rural farm to rural residential. Schools are not permitted in the rural farm designation but are allowed in rural residential areas.

Bethel School District and Rainier View Christian Church, which has its Graham campus on the other portion of the 117 acres, made the request.

Bethel, the third-largest school district in Pierce County, provides education for more than 17,700 students in the growing Spanaway, Graham and Frederickson areas.

Six area residents challenged the county’s decision. They contended the change violated provisions of the state’s Growth Management Act to protect rural character, according to the board’s decision.

The board said the county did not violate its comprehensive plan by redesignating the land. However, it ruled that permitting a school in a rural location to serve urban students violated not only other county policies and community plans but also the Puget Sound Regional Council’s Vision 2040 plan. As a result, the board’s ruling blocked the land-use change to rural residential and the potential school.

“This was the first time the Growth Management Board had deferred to multi-county policies when reviewing a case,” district spokeswoman Krista Carlson said. The board distinguished between school districts and other property owners in the rural residential designation to deny the district’s request, she said.

Bethel filed for reconsideration “to both exercise and preserve our legal rights as property owners,” Carlson said.

Bethel Superintendent Tom Seigel declined comment. Mary Urback, the district’s attorney, did not return phone calls.

Jim Halmo, one of the six petitioners concerned about suburban sprawl, said the board determined the county failed to work with the school district to locate the school within the urban growth area. “The county has a responsibility to make sure these things are sited properly,” said Halmo, a Graham resident.

Deputy prosecutor Pete Philley said the county is concerned the growth board is asking it to coordinate where districts should locate a school before they purchase property.

Pierce County supported the school district in its reconsideration request.

Philley said the hearings board is “concerned about having a large school campus in a rural area that might drive urban growth in an area that’s not supposed to have it.”

But those issues – what the district would build and who it would serve – could be addressed later through the permitting process, which requires a hearings examiner, Philley said.

“They get to buy wherever they want,” Philley said. “Until they decide whether they want to build on it, it’s really none of our business where they purchase property.”

steve.maynard@thenewstribune.com 253-597-8647 blog.thenewstribune.com/street @TNTstevemaynard

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

PHOTOS
CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Future of rural Whatcom development at stake in public hearing

    Whatcom County's hired staff and appointed planning commissioners disagree over how to comply with state law by doing more to protect the character of rural areas.

    It's up to the County Council to resolve the separate proposals from the planning commission and from Planning and Development Services. Before that happens, the council will hold a public hearing to take comments on the proposals on Tuesday, May 21.

    The council is under an order by the state Growth Management Hearings Board to approve, by July 3, more restrictive rules governing rural growth. This will be the council's fourth pass at resolving an appeal originally filed in 2005 against the "rural element" of the county's state-mandated comprehensive plan.

  • Gopher ruling threatens vitality of county

    On Dec. 11, 2012, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued a proposed rule to list the Mazama pocket gopher as a threatened species under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA). The proposed ESA listing would apply only to the Mazama pocket gopher subspecies found in Thurston County and on Joint Base Lewis-McChord. The federal government has determined that gophers subspecies found in other Washington counties are not threatened.

  • Challenger returns to vie for Whatcom council seat

    Michelle Luke of Lummi Island will make another run at the Whatcom County Council seat held by Carl Weimer.

    Since her narrow loss to Weimer in 2009, Luke, 60, was appointed to the county Planning Commission. Her inroad into government has been through land-use planning, starting in 2004 with the Lummi Island sub-area plan.

    Luke favors a small-scale slaughterhouse industry on agricultural land. Council members have spent almost a year so far figuring out how that will work.

  • Split decision on 2013 Comprehensive Plan amendments

    The Gig Harbor City Council Monday night approved by a vote of 7-0 a city-sponsored Comprehensive Plan text amendment to incorporate the adopted Harbor Vision into the plan and develop implementation policies. A second text amendment was not included as part of the 2013 Comprehensive Plan Amendment voted on by the council, so it will not go on to the city’s Planning Commission for processing at this time.

  • Hearing tonight on annexation

    The Olympia City Council will hold a public hearing tonight on a request from the Olympia School District for the city to annex 8.69 acres off Boulevard Road for the new Olympia Regional Learning Academy.