tool name

close
tool goes here

Federal appeals court seeks help in 2005 Tacoma Mall shooting suit decision

A federal appeals court panel is asking for the Washington State Supreme Court’s help in deciding whether a lawsuit over a 2005 shooting at the Tacoma Mall should be revived.

Published: Aug. 7, 2012 at 6:49 a.m. PDTUpdated: Aug. 7, 2012 at 10:03 a.m. PDT
0 comments

A federal appeals court panel is asking for the Washington State Supreme Court’s help in deciding whether a lawsuit over a 2005 shooting at the Tacoma Mall should be revived.

Dominick S. Maldonado, then 20, went on an eight-minute shooting rampage on Nov. 20, 2005, during which he wounded seven people and took four hostages at a music store in the mall. One of the victims, Brendan McKown, sued the mall’s owners for negligence in failing to protect the customers.

A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, and McKown, who was paralyzed, appealed.

The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals judges said Monday that they need help determining to what extent, under Washington state law, the mall’s owner owed a duty to protect shoppers there. They sent three questions to the state Supreme Court, and how the high court answers will help guide the Ninth Circuit’s ruling.

In October 2007, a Pierce County jury convicted Maldonado of 15 crimes in connection with the shooting spree. He was sentenced to 163 years in prison.

The Associated Press

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Court denies US asylum to German home-schoolers

    A federal appeals court has denied asylum to a Christian family that fled Germany so they could home-school their children, after ruling that U.S. immigration laws do not grant a safe haven to people everywhere who face restrictions that would be prohibited under the Constitution.

  • Killer Joseph Duncan competent, says psychologist

    BOISE, Idaho — A forensic psychologist who examined convicted murderer Joseph Duncan four years ago said Duncan scored high on a test measuring paranoia, but was still legally competent to serve as his own attorney when he waived his right to appeal his death sentence.

  • GRANTS PASS, ORE.: Court tosses deal over rare species

    A federal appeals court has thrown out an agreement between environmentalists and the federal government that restored protections for rare species in old growth forests.

  • Filing seeks criminal checks in Boston Bulger case

    Federal prosecutors asked the court Thursday to allow criminal background checks on potential jurors in the racketeering trial of reputed gangster James "Whitey" Bulger.

  • Appeals court dismisses suit by family of murder victims

    A federal appeals court has ordered the dismissal of a lawsuit brought by family members who contended Massachusetts officials were negligent in their supervision of the ex-con who killed Brian and Beverly Mauck of Graham.