tool name

close
tool goes here

America's war in Afghanistan has reached the end game

Compared with past wars, America’s struggle against the Taliban in Afghanistan has been light on casualties.

Published: Aug. 27, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

Compared with past wars, America’s struggle against the Taliban in Afghanistan has been light on casualties.

After almost 12 years, the U.S. death toll stands at roughly 2,000. In the bloodiest battles of World War II and the Civil War, this country has lost that many in a single day.

But the trend – reflected in a spate of recent casualties among soldiers from Joint Base Lewis-McChord – has been headed in the wrong direction. A New York Times analysis last week showed that the rate of deaths has risen dramatically in the last two years.

A few numbers tell the story: It took almost nine years for the United States to lose its first 1,000 troops in Afghanistan. It took only 27 months to lose the second 1,000.

JBLM soldiers have been killed with familiar weapons, roadside bombs and small arms. But others have been killed by unfriendly “friendlies.”

With the United States moving toward withdrawal from Afghanistan by the end of 2014, American and NATO troops have been training the country’s army and other security forces to defend their own population against the Taliban. Some men in Afghan uniforms have been turning their weapons on Americans. Six Marines were killed on one day alone, Aug. 10, in two separate attacks.

Afghan officials claim the attackers are Taliban fighters who infiltrated government forces. The Pentagon attributes the killings to individuals who harbor grudges against foreign troops.

Either way, such attacks would be rare if the Afghan government and its military commanders were effectively policing the ranks of their own forces.

The country as a whole is splintered into tribes and factions – Taliban or not – that resent each other and Westerners to varying degrees. If the government can’t build an army that transcends those grievances and rivalries, Afghanistan’s future will remain bleak.

At this point, the United States has two arguably good reasons to stick to President Obama’s gradual troop withdrawal schedule.

By increasing the chances that the current government – corrupt but nondepraved – will ultimately stand on its own, we lower the chances that Afghanistan will relapse into a staging ground for attacks on Americans. By preventing depraved fanatics from retaking the country, we prevent them from inflicting their familiar atrocities on women, girls and nonfanatics.

But if it becomes clear that neither of those good outcomes is going to happen – or that the Western presence is working against those good outcomes – it will be time to cut our losses with greater haste than Obama has in mind.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Afghan forces take over, doubts loom

    Afghan security forces are now officially in charge of protecting their country from the insurgents whom the U.S.-led coalition of foreign troops has been fighting here for more than 11 years, President Hamid Karzai announced during a ceremony Tuesday, even as news broke that the Taliban were opening a long-discussed political office in Qatar, clearing a potential path to peace talks.

  • Afghans poised to take security lead from US, NATO

    One of the most significant turning points in one of America's longest and costliest wars is imminent: Afghanistan's fledgling security forces are taking the lead for security nationwide, bringing the moment of truth on the question of whether they are ready to fight an insurgency that remains resilient after nearly 12 years of conflict.

  • Obama’s drone war kills ‘others,’ not just al Qaida leaders

    Contrary to assurances it has deployed U.S. drones only against known senior leaders of al Qaida and allied groups, the Obama administration has targeted and killed hundreds of suspected lower-level Afghan, Pakistani and unidentified “other” militants in scores of strikes in Pakistan’s rugged tribal area, classified U.S. intelligence reports show.

  • Change of commanders in Afghanistan starts clock on end of U.S. war there

    Inside the heavily secured headquarters of the NATO-led forces here, the man who could be the last commander of America’s longest war will officially take charge Sunday of U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

  • US tries saving Taliban talks after Karzai objects

    Hopes dimmed for talks aimed at ending the Afghan war when an angry President Hamid Karzai on Wednesday suspended security negotiations with the U.S. and scuttled a peace delegation to the Taliban, sending American officials scrambling to preserve the possibility of dialogue with the militants.