tool name

close
tool goes here

In Putin's Russia, dissent against government really is an act of bravery

Chances are the following names won’t ring a bell: Galina Starovoytova, Anna Politkovskaya, Natalia Estemirova. But if you’ve paid attention to the news in recent weeks, you probably are familiar with the name of Russia’s most notorious feminist punk band – Pussy Riot.

Published: Aug. 28, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

Chances are the following names won’t ring a bell: Galina Starovoytova, Anna Politkovskaya, Natalia Estemirova. But if you’ve paid attention to the news in recent weeks, you probably are familiar with the name of Russia’s most notorious feminist punk band – Pussy Riot.

The three women mentioned above were Russian democracy and human rights activists who were killed – assassinated, actually – for doing or saying the wrong things.

Starovoytova was gunned down in 1998 after years of promoting democratic reform in post-Soviet Russia, advocating for ethnic minorities and criticizing Russia’s deplorable conduct during its war in Chechnya. Politkovskaya, a journalist who wrote on the same subjects, took three bullets in 2006. Estemirova, a leader of one of Russia’s most respected human rights organizations, was kidnapped and shot to death in 2009.

Yet it is three members of Pussy Riot – Maria Alekhina, Yekaterina Samutsevich and Nadezhda Tolokonnikova – whose conviction recently on charges of “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred” has made them a celebrated cause in the West, especially among digitally-connected consumers of pop culture.

The band is known for politically-loaded lyrics that are highly critical of Russian President Vladimir Putin and for guerrilla performances in their signature balaclava head coverings.

One of those “performances” took place in February at Moscow’s Christ the Savior Cathedral. Authorities arrested the three women weeks later and held them in jail through their trial this month. On Aug. 17, a judge sentenced them to two years in a penal colony.

In nations with traditions of law and individual rights, the women’s offense – legally speaking – would have been something on the order of trespassing or disorderly conduct, punishable by a brief stay in jail and a modest fine. In the court of public opinion, their theatrics would be considered in the same category as Sinead O’Connor ripping up a photo of Pope John Paul II – to some, a juvenile antic calculated to provoke outrage; for others, the edgy politicization of art.

In Putin’s Russia, however, offending the powerful is dangerous, even lethal. And the plight of the Moscow Three has enlightened a new generation about the fallacies of a moral relativism that posits Western governments in general and the U.S. government in particular are no different from and no better than those in countries such as Russia, China, Iran, Cuba and Venezuela.

Since the Vietnam War at least, Americans have become accustomed to seeing pop icons cozying up to foreign demagogues and going abroad to criticize the United States. Foolish fans mistakenly see such embarrassing displays as brave acts of dissent.

But there’s no bravery involved in Americans faulting their country or flattering its adversaries. For them, doing so is constitutionally protected. For citizens of other countries, it’s a different story.

Of all people, leave it to Madonna – on tour in Russia – to stand up for the imprisoned Pussy Riot members and set the record straight.

“As an artist, as a human being, as a woman, I have freedom to express my point of view, even if other people don’t agree with me,” she told a Moscow audience. “Even if my government doesn’t agree with me.”

Are Masha, Katya and Nadya – as sympathizers refer to the band members – more deserving of international support than the countless defenders of human rights and individual freedom who have been imprisoned, tortured and murdered in Russia and elsewhere?

Of course not. But if popular culture and social networking can make Pussy Riot a topic of global conversation, then just maybe Galina, Anna and Natalia will not be forgotten.

Jonathan Gurwitz is a columnist at the San Antonio (Texas) Express-News.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Russian court denies Pussy Riot's Alekhina parole

    A Russian court denied parole on Thursday to a member of the Pussy Riot punk group.

  • UN General Assembly approves Syria resolution

    The U.N. General Assembly approved an Arab-backed resolution Wednesday calling for a political transition in Syria, but more than 70 countries refused to vote "yes" because of its support for the main opposition group and fears the resolution could torpedo a new U.S.-Russia effort to end the escalating conflict.

  • Sports of wrestling hopes to pull an Olympic reversal

    I watched a video of the movie “Argo” as I flew into Tehran recently. I couldn’t help but wonder why I was willingly accompanying a group of Americans into a city that not so long ago was the scene of one of the greatest exfiltrations ever. I wondered if Ben Affleck would rescue me if things were to go poorly.

  • Russia says it will keep selling missiles to Syria

    Russia defended its sales of anti-aircraft systems to the regime of Syrian President Bashar Assad, just days after joining forces with the U.S. for a new push to end Syria's civil war through negotiations.

  • Russia targets pollster for 'political activity'

    Russia's only independent polling agency said Monday it may have to close after prosecutors targeted it for "political activity" under a law spearheading President Vladimir Putin's crackdown on civil society.