tool name

close
tool goes here

Debates quiet on climate change

WASHINGTON – For the first time since the topic surfaced in a presidential race in 1988, nominees made no mention of climate change during the prime-time television debates this year between the presidential contenders themselves or their running mates.

Published: Oct. 24, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

WASHINGTON – For the first time since the topic surfaced in a presidential race in 1988, nominees made no mention of climate change during the prime-time television debates this year between the presidential contenders themselves or their running mates.

Debate moderators also chose not to ask President Barack Obama or former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney about the issue, despite a clamor by climate activists and some not-so-gentle prodding on the part of pundits and scientists.

The national hush on climate change – which became a toxic political issue after a cap-and-trade bill collapsed in Congress in 2010 – became so deafening this election year that some activists dubbed it “climate silence.” Some environmentalists struggled to summon enthusiasm for the Democratic president’s re-election campaign until Obama’s assertion that “climate change is not a hoax” brought delegates to their feet at the Democratic National Convention.

Even former Vice President Al Gore, whose film “An Inconvenient Truth” swayed public opinion on global warming, made mention of it during Monday night’s debate on foreign policy. “Where is global warming in this debate?” he asked on Twitter. “Climate change is an urgent foreign policy issue.”

But no matter who takes office in January, the next administration will have to take bold steps to address global warming and its consequences, environmental experts say. Already, sea levels are rising in some places, and sea ice covering the Arctic Ocean fell to the lowest extent in satellite history this summer. Emergency managers have begun grappling with more intense hurricanes, drought and other extreme weather that could be tied to changing global temperatures.

The question isn’t whether anything must be done on climate change after the election, said Andrew Steer, president of the World Resources Institute, an environmental think tank. The question instead is what must be done and whether it’s too late to adequately address global warming, he said.

“We are at the moment in a period in American history when, for various reasons, there’s been a confluence of factors that combined have led to this astonishing unwillingness to grapple with what clearly is a huge issue for the future for us all,” Steer said. “I’m not confident that it will change.”

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Sen. Marco Rubio, GOP’s choice for State of the Union response, doubts climate change

    Sen. Marco Rubio will offer up the Republican response to President Barack Obama’s State of the Union address next week, demonstrating the younger, more diverse face of the party as the nation confronts such issues as immigration.

  • Climate change activists turn to plans, persuasion, prayer in Obama’s second term

    Just before he and other environmentalists marched to the White House on Tuesday, climate change activist James Hansen warned he wouldn’t be able to be arrested with them this time. Hansen, a NASA scientist by day and an activist on his own time, had to be available for a press conference in the afternoon announcing that worldwide temperatures in 2012 were in the top 10 hottest ever recorded.

  • Rocky Barker: Obama wants to keep the West happy

    Don’t look for a lot of policies out of the Obama administration that will make life harder for western Democrats.

  • Obama has the power to push coal out the door

    The test of President Barack Obama’s seriousness about addressing climate change is not his pending decision on the much-debated Keystone XL pipeline. It’s whether he effectively consigns coal-fired power plants – one of the biggest sources of carbon emissions – to the ashcan of history.

  • Hearing on EPA nominee Gina McCarthy focuses on agency’s long reach

    Even the Republicans who are the most critical of the Environmental Protection Agency had few questions about whether Gina McCarthy has the qualifications for the job. The agency’s regulatory practices and transparency got a lashing at McCarthy’s Senate confirmation hearing, though. And both Democrats and Republicans acknowledged that the agency under her leadership would likely take the lead in reducing greenhouse gas emissions in the absence of significant congressional action on climate change.