tool name

close
tool goes here

UPlace refinances debt owed on Town Center

The City of University Place has refinanced debt owed on its Town Center mixed-use project, allowing the city to avoid making a payment it couldn’t afford.

Published: Nov. 16, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PST
0 comments

The City of University Place has refinanced debt owed on its Town Center mixed-use project, allowing the city to avoid making a payment it couldn’t afford.

The city was rescheduled to make a $12.4 million principal payment on a portion of the Town Center debt by December 2013; the refinancing breaks that payment into installments over 25 years. State auditors had concluded UP didn’t have the money to make next year’s balloon payment.

Also Wednesday, UP refinanced $1.8 million it owes on debt issued to develop Cirque Park to take advantage of lower interest rates. The Cirque Park debt will be retired in nine years.

The city has been making annual interest-only payments of about $705,000 on the Town Center debt, and interest and principal payments of about $239,000 on the Cirque Park bonds, totalling $944,000 a year.

The combined payments will now increase to about $1.1 million. The total payment goes up because UP will now pay down principal on the Town Center debt. The average interest paid on both debts will drop from 5.67 to 4.42 percent.

It’s the second time the city has refinanced the money it borrowed to purchase the Town Center properties and buy out leases of sitting tenants. The city secured the line of credit in 2003 and converted it to short-term financing four years later.

The city received another bit of good news Wednesday: The cost of the refinancing was less than expected, meaning officials can put another $120,000 in reserves.

christian.hill@thenewstribune.com

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Despite bond downgrade, Tacoma happy

    When does a city trumpet a credit ratings downgrade? After digging itself out of a $63 million budget hole, that’s when.

  • Tacoma trumpets new bond ratings — even a downgrade

    When does a city trumpet a credit ratings downgrade? Apparently, after digging itself out of a $63 million budget hole, that’s when.

  • Parking deal helps city fund at crucial point

    State Farm hasn’t even arrived yet, but already the company has been good to the City of Tacoma.

  • Tacoma OKs deal to lease parking spaces to State Farm

    State Farm hasn't even arrived yet, but already the company has been good to the City of Tacoma. Under separate parking agreements approved Tuesday by the City Council, the city stands to make $4.2 million over the next five years by leasing more than 800 permits for the insurance company in three city-owned downtown garages that now largely stand vacant.

  • Financial issues for Reach Interpretive Center questioned by report

    A review of the long-awaited Hanford Reach Interpretive Center's financial feasibility concludes officials might be underestimating construction costs and may be overly optimistic about some revenues.

    The 25-page independent review also says the center may "be limited by its staffing capabilities and reliance on in-kind services and volunteers," according to a draft provided to the Herald. It urges the city of Richland and Richland Public Facilities District to "consider what they will do in case revenue expectations and continued support are not met."

    Reach officials say the review paints an unfair picture of the project, at times relying on inaccurate numbers and making apples-to-oranges comparisons. Rick Jansons, vice-president of the public facilities district board, called it "sloppy" during a board meeting Monday, and said it "overstated the risk."