tool name

close
tool goes here

Oh, no! Texas is leaving! (Is that a bad thing?)

If you ever had any doubt that this is a nation of political hysterics, consider the fact that tens of thousands of people in each presidential election promise to leave the country if the “wrong” guy wins.

Published: Dec. 1, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PST
0 comments

If you ever had any doubt that this is a nation of political hysterics, consider the fact that tens of thousands of people in each presidential election promise to leave the country if the “wrong” guy wins.

And yet, when the contender they fear wins, virtually none of these highly excitable people keep their promise. Then we’re stuck with their irksome sobbing for another four years.

The prospect of second-term victories by the last two presidents left abnormal numbers of our citizens fearing that the world would end if the wrong candidate wins.

When Republican President George W. Bush ran for a second term in 2004, emotional liberals displayed the full shrieking extent of their devotion to the notion that they would leave this land for saner places if Bush won again.

“If Bush wins again,” they would proclaim, “I will move to Canada!”

“Me, too!” everyone at the same liberal prayer meetings would declare.

Of course, they were fibbing to themselves. There weren’t three of them who actually moved to Canada. That begs the question: Did they realize that, in Canada, they would have found what they were running from – the occasional victory by a candidate who seemed noxious to them?

The Canadians have the exact same problem that we do: Every election produces a winner that half the population regrets. That’s just the way elections are – a winner and a loser. And the loser is sometimes your candidate.

I’m guessing that some Canadians, being normal human beings, also get so fed up with their own electorate that they promise to move to the United States if their side loses an election.

But most Canadians don’t actually move south when their heroes lose. I live not far from the Canadian border. I have never seen Canadians flooding over the border when they don’t get their way.

However, if you actually are ready to move when your side loses, then why would you be so lazy and unimaginative as to limit yourself to the neighboring country when choosing a healing destination for your new national home? Why not Sweden or Australia or maybe a really cool place like Iceland?

People who threaten to move to another country if their candidate loses hardly ever move. However, you have to hand it to Republican hysterics this year who are ready to go to a new extreme when their political sky is falling. They had high hopes that Democratic President Barack Obama would lose. But he didn’t, and now they’re hurting just like losers on the left in other years.

But anti-Obama oddballs have gone the anti-Bush loonies one better. They aren’t threatening to move themselves. They are threatening to stay put, secede from the union and form a new country in their current location.

For instance, several thousand weepy Texans are threatening to form a new nation that is neither a part of this country nor of Mexico.

(Sadly, some residents of Mexico have jumped to the mistaken conclusion that Texas will rejoin its original home inside Mexico. Mexicans are so irate that they might have to take Texas back that they are threatening to leave Mexico and move to Guatemala.)

But be grateful for hysterics. Too much sanity can take the spice out of a country’s politics. Our elections would become unimaginably dull without the apoplectic passion of the excitable left and the outraged right.

(Be warned: If you don’t agree with me on today’s column, I will leave this country, but not just yet. I don’t want to miss another installment of my favorite soap opera, the next presidential election.)

Bill Hall can be contacted at wilberth@cableone.net or at 1012 Prospect Ave., Lewiston, ID 83501.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Outgoing S.C. Sen. Jim DeMint shook up Washington

    For his first eight years in Washington, Jim DeMint was like most members of Congress – relatively quiet, fairly innocuous and pretty much unknown outside his state.

  • In Mexico, fears for democracy as threatened journalists curtail coverage

    Quitze Fernandez, a columnist for the El Guardian newspaper in this capital of Coahuila state abutting Texas, picked up the phone in his newsroom one day.

  • Obama’s second term: Guns, immigration, taxes – and warnings of hubris

    Four years ago, President Barack Obama used his inaugural address to declare “an end to the petty grievances, and false promises, the recriminations and worn-out dogmas that for far too long have strangled our politics.”

  • For Republicans in 2016, the more the merrier

    In a report speculating that former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush may run for president in 2016, The New York Times observes, “When Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida held a strategy session here to discuss his own political future last week, the question of Mr. Bush, a mentor, hung over the room; a decision by Mr. Bush, 59, to seek the Republican nomination would almost certainly halt any plans by Mr. Rubio, 41, to do so or abruptly set off a new intraparty feud.”

  • Nothing good will come from Keystone pipeline

    President Barack Obama is facing a critical opportunity to take the country beyond its century-and-a-half reliance on oil. Earth Day (today) and this past weekend’s third anniversary of the BP Gulf of Mexico disaster offer stark reminders of the stakes and mistakes inherent in crude.