tool name

close
tool goes here

Owner closing state stores because of liquor law

VANCOUVER, Wash. — An Oregon man is getting out of the Washington state liquor business after fees drove up his prices and consumers found cheaper booze in chain stores and across the state line.

Published: Dec. 23, 2012 at 12:05 a.m. PST
0 comments

VANCOUVER, Wash. — An Oregon man is getting out of the Washington state liquor business after fees drove up his prices and consumers found cheaper booze in chain stores and across the state line.

Don Sidhu had $2.1 million in investor money that he spent on four former state-run liquor stores privatized when the state switched away from a state-operated liquor system this year.

Customers told Sidhu that they would buy their booze at Oregon’s lower-priced, state-operated stores, The Vancouver Columbian reported.

Sidhu apologized to customers for the fees, which in some cases led to prices 22 percent higher than those in Oregon.

“They said, ‘Don’t be sorry, you’re the one who’s going to lose your business,’” said Sidhu, a Woodburn, Ore., resident who closed his stores in Kennewick and Kirkland and plans to shutter his remaining two stores in Vancouver some time next month.

Liquor sales in Oregon increased 9.4 percent in October 2012, compared with October 2011. At Oregon’s 12 border stores, sales increased by 34 percent.

Compounding the problem is distributors, who in many cases charge smaller stores between 25 percent and 35 percent more than they charge volume discounters such as Costco.

“In the old system, everybody in the state paid the same price, and now, if you’re not close to a Costco or big-box, you’re paying a whole lot more for the same product,” said John Guadnola of the Washington Beer & Wine Distributors Association. “It’s so much cheaper to deliver a truckload to one place and have the customer break it up and deliver it out to the individual stores.”

Sidhu isn’t alone in facing a quick, devastating business failure in Washington’s new free-market liquor sales environment.

Of the 167 former state-run liquor stores that Washington auctioned off, Sidhu estimates only 60 or 70 remain open. He said he had a disadvantage in being a small store. The lack of volume discounts from distributors, competition from Oregon, and the loss of commercial sales that were a key profit center for the former state-run liquor stores have all contributed to the demise of the former state-run stores.

“I will keep my head high,” he said, “and move forward.”

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • State revenues grow from liquor privatization

    A year ago, you couldn’t buy liquor at grocery stores in Washington. Now you can, but you probably pay more for it.

  • Smaller liquor store owners call for new rules in order to compete

    A group representing the owners of Washington’s former state liquor stores says unfair competition is smothering their business and they want the Legislature and the Washington State Liquor Control Board to enact new rules to put them on an equal stance with larger competitors.

  • Bars, restaurants get more options to buy booze

    Until last year, restaurants and bars had one choice for where to buy liquor: state government.

  • A year after privatization, liquor sales down in Whatcom County

    While the shift to liquor privatization appears to have boosted state tax revenue in the first year, it had a chilling effect on sales in Whatcom County.

    On June 1, 2012, Initiative 1183 went into effect, turning over sales of liquor from the state stores to retail businesses. Initial reaction by residents appeared mixed: While many appreciated the increased choices in terms of product and locations, the sting of significantly higher prices may have turned off others.

    In terms of tax revenue, the state has benefited from the first year of I-1183. In the collection periods between July 11, 2012, and May 10, 2013, the state brought in $223.5 million in liquor spirit taxes, an 11.2 percent increase compared to the same period a year earlier, according to data from the Washington State Department of Revenue.

  • Olympia distributors seek delay of single-serve ban

    The Washington Beer & Wine Distributors Association is asking the city of Olympia to hold off on pursuing a mandatory ban on certain single-serve alcohol drinks and allow local distributors to voluntarily stop distributing the adult beverages.