The Herald, Puyallup, WA -

Welcome | Logout | My Account
Welcome Guest | Log In | Register
x

The Puyallup Herald

Serving Puyallup, South Hill, Sumner, Bonney Lake, Edgewood

Web Search powered by YAHOO! SEARCH

tool name

close
tool goes here

Solution to Newtown tragedy lies within the United States' power

Some days, it is so difficult to listen to the latest news, its stories often confronting us with one more instance of sorrow, loss and challenge.

Published: 12/26/12 12:05 am
0 comments

Some days, it is so difficult to listen to the latest news, its stories often confronting us with one more instance of sorrow, loss and challenge.

These past weeks, stories from Newtown, Conn., have been crushing to the heart and the spirit. The terror faced by staff members and students of Sandy Hook Elementary is unimaginable.

And yet, their ordeal risks becoming just one more story of our inhumanity to one another, one too frequently played out all across the nation.

With you, I, too, wish at times like these for a God who steps in to interfere directly, to extend a strong hand that shields the innocent and a mighty thumb that squishes the one who causes such harm. But that isn’t the way God works, according to biblical witness.

God offers us assurance of his caring presence even in the midst of tragedy, not insurance against things that cause harm. The question we rush to ask, wondering how God could allow such things to happen, is better stated as, “How can we keep allowing such things to happen?”

The causes that underlie the Newtown massacre will be manifold, and changes will be necessary throughout a range of important areas, from mental-health screening and treatments, to renewed efforts at commonsense gun-safety laws.

But I found the comments of President Barack Obama to be helpful when he asked why we feel so powerless to make needed changes or so willing to accept tragedies like these as the cost of protecting second-amendment rights for citizens who wish to be armed like a militia.

It’s true that our attitude and behavior regarding guns needs a grand debate in hopes of instigating necessary change, and I say that as a gun owner. I purchased my first shotgun when I was 13 after I completed a gun-safety and hunter-education course in Minnesota.

I support gun ownership as within our constitutional rights to possess and use weapons but as a right that comes with the preconditions of gun-safety training, the use of adequate and lockable storage, gun registration and licensing, including laws that regulate the types of guns that can be owned by civilians, with limits on the size of magazine (bullet) capacity, and even on how guns can be transported. Such rules support basic constitutional rights without becoming repressive.

The truth is, in the wrong hands, guns do kill people, and in America, they kill more than 30 people every day, on average. Imagine a Sandy Hook disaster day after day after day. No community or nation should face such carnage.

If we fail to make changes and enact laws that resemble those of other democratic nations whose populace are far safer than ours, we will only continue to lose our children, our spouses, our neighbors, our friends at a horrendous rate.

Things must change.

Again, instead of simply wondering why God would allow such awful things to happen, we must pause and ask the more personal question:

Why do we?

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Looking for lessons – and reality – in Newtown

    After I wrote a few days ago urging tighter gun control, I faced incoming salvos from firearm enthusiasts. Let me respond to some of their arguments:

  • Obama proposes assault-weapons ban, other controls on guns

    President Barack Obama pledged Wednesday to put the full weight of his office behind the nation’s most aggressive gun-control plan in generations as he hopes to decrease the number of mass shootings and acts of random violence that occur every day in America.

  • Gun concerns evoking sound and fury, but will anything change?

    Poll after poll finds more Americans agree that their elected officials need to do something, anything, to prevent more children from dying in a nation with more firearms than any other in the world. But in Washington – where cooperation in a divided Congress is tenuous at best – it still may not be enough.

  • It shouldn’t take tragedies to bring us here

    More than a week has passed since the bombings at the finish line at the Boston Marathon. One of the terror suspects is dead; the other, the first man’s younger brother, lies in a hospital unable to speak because of a gunshot wound to his throat. Four people were killed and more than 200 injured as the country’s undivided attention once again turned to the East Coast.

  • We must take action now – and it begins with guns

    We are not helpless to stop the massacre of innocent children. We must begin – today, right now, this minute – taking guns out of the hands of madmen, and the first step should be a ban on military-style assault weapons such as the rifle used to turn a Connecticut school into a slaughterhouse.