tool name

close
tool goes here

Coal train issue draws scrutiny in Puyallup, Sumner

Puyallup and Sumner leaders are voicing concerns about traffic congestion and other problems that proposed increases in coal trains through East Pierce County could cause.

Published: Jan. 8, 2013 at 6:35 a.m. PSTUpdated: Jan. 8, 2013 at 6:35 a.m. PST
0 comments

Puyallup and Sumner leaders are voicing concerns about traffic congestion and other problems that proposed increases in coal trains through East Pierce County could cause.

The cities are adding to regional worries that at least 18 trains per day will be added to Burlington Northern Santa Fe tracks for exporting coal from Montana and Wyoming to Asia through a proposed terminal in Whatcom County.

Puyallup City Council member John Palmer said he wants the council to agree tonight to prepare a letter or resolution to the state and to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It would urge them to examine how the proposed Cherry Point terminal near Ferndale would affect Puyallup and other local communities.

Palmer worries about vehicle congestion at the half-dozen rail crossings in Puyallup and the coal dust and diesel emissions the trains could leave behind.

“My concern is to make sure all these impacts to the City of Puyallup and every other city in the Puget Sound are considered as part of the environmental review,” Palmer said.

He and council member Kent Boyle, who couldn’t be reached for comment, have asked the City Council to discuss the issue at its meeting today at 6:30 p.m. in City Hall.

Palmer works as a policy adviser on water quality and salmon protection with the Environmental Protection Agency in Seattle. He said his work does not involve the coal train issue. But the EPA would play a role in the upcoming environmental review of the project.

In Sumner, Mayor Dave Enslow recently asked the state Department of Ecology to address his concerns about traffic and safety in its environmental study.

A total of 18 mile-long trains would run through Sumner each day, in addition to the 50 passenger and freight trains that already pass through daily. Each train would cause about a six-minute crossing delay, stopping traffic for a total of 108 more minutes a day, Enslow said. Fire trucks and police cars would be stuck with other vehicles.

“We think there’s the potential for a long train to disrupt the town,” Enslow said. “We just want to add our voice to all the people who are concerned about this.”

Business and labor groups have supported the region-wide coal export project, saying it will bring more jobs.

The $600 million Gateway Pacific Project at Cherry Point would be the largest of five proposed terminals in Washington and Oregon. The other site in Washington is in Longview, which wouldn’t add to traffic congestion for the Puget Sound region.

A public comment period on the Cherry Point project ends Jan. 21, after which an environmental impact statement will be drafted. The terminal could handle up to 54 million bulk tons a year.

Last month, hundreds of opponents and supporters of the project turned out in Seattle at the final public meeting on the project before the environmental review.

Seattle Mayor Mike McGinn and King County Executive Dow Constantine were among those worried about the effects of many more trains per day. McGinn said Seattle will study the traffic and safety impacts on the city.

steve.maynard@thenewstribune.com
blog.thenewstribune.com/street
@TNTstevemaynard

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • South Sound would reap few benefits from more coal trains

    At first glance, a proposal to ship millions of more tons of coal through a Whatcom County terminal might not sound like something that should concern South Sound residents all that much. After all, trains already transport coal through Pierce County for shipment out of Seattle.

  • Coal train traffic potential to be studied in central Puget Sound

    The economic effects of increased coal train traffic from the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal in Cherry Point will be studied in the central Puget Sound area.

    The Puget Sound Regional Council, a regional transportation planning group, has decided to spend up to $100,000 on the study of impacts in the Snohomish, King, Pierce and Kitsap counties.

    Officials said they want specifics in their efforts to ensure their concerns are addressed before the coal terminal would be allowed.

  • Wyoming coal company strikes export deal to use Cherry Point terminal

    A Wyoming mining company has signed an option agreement allowing it to ship up to 16 million tons of coal a year through Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point — if that project can get the regulatory approvals it needs.

    Cloud Peak Energy said Wednesday's deal involving Gateway Pacific Terminal, proposed by SSA Marine of Seattle, will allow it to expand overseas sales amid weak domestic demand.

    The company has mines in Wyoming and Montana. It shipped 4.4 million tons of coal to Asian customers in 2012.

  • State and federal agencies want sweeping review of proposed Cherry Point coal port

    State and federal agencies have joined project opponents in calling for a wide-ranging review of potential impacts from the Gateway Pacific Terminal project that SSA Marine hopes to build at Whatcom County's Cherry Point.

    SSA Marine and its allies have made it clear they would prefer an environmental impact statement that focuses on the immediate environs of the coal pier site itself, on industrial waterfront south of the BP Cherry Point Refinery.

    Environmental groups fighting the coal terminal, as well as people concerned about health and traffic impacts from coal trains, have demanded a broader review. They want an analysis that includes air pollution and climate change impact from coal burning, as well as assessment of rail traffic impacts from Wyoming and Montana mines to Cherry Point.

  • Politics, environmental worries threaten new coal ports in the Northwest

    WASHINGTON — Growing environmental objections to exporting coal from Washington state and Oregon have begun to endanger the coal industry’s hope to restore its flagging fortunes by shipping much more of the embattled fossil fuel to China and India.

    Port officials this week dropped plans for a terminal in Coos Bay, Ore., just days after the governors of Oregon and Washington urged the White House to scrutinize the global impact of greenhouse gas emissions in Asia before approving exports from Northwest ports.

    The Coos Bay cancellation follows last year’s abandonment of a proposed coal storage and export facility in Grays Harbor, Wash. And the Sierra Club announced plans this week to sue over alleged water contamination from trains spilling coal dust and fragments. That could further complicate matters for advocates of shipping coal by rail to U.S. Northwest ports for export to the Far East.