tool name

close
tool goes here

Developers offer various visions for Bellingham waterfront

Published: Jan. 23, 2013 at 5:01 a.m. PSTUpdated: April 19, 2013 at 11:29 a.m. PDT
0 comments
The Granary Building on Bellingham's waterfront, built in 1928 as the focal point of a once-booming egg and poultry business in Whatcom County, is just one of many sites being considered for redevelopment by the Port of Bellingham. (PHILIP A. DWYER/THE BELLINGHAM HERALD)

BELLINGHAM - Nine would-be developers have provided the Port of Bellingham with preliminary ideas for the first phase of waterfront development, and they have widely varying ideas about the suitability of the Granary Building for rehabilitation.

The Granary's prospects are just one element of the development plans presented in rough outline in response to the port's request for expressions of developer interest in a small portion of its waterfront holdings envisioned as the first phase of long-awaited waterfront redevelopment. The site is 10.8 acres at the northeastern edge of the old Georgia-Pacific Corp. mill site along Whatcom Waterway.

Among the ideas that developers are discussing are artist lofts, luxury hotels, a swimming pool, apartments, offices and shops.

The Granary Building was built in 1928 as the focal point of a once-booming egg and poultry business in Whatcom County. It has been vacant for years and was the property of Georgia-Pacific Corp. before that company shut down and handed over its 137 acres of industrial land to the port in 2005.

Until recently, port officials had contended the Granary was not salvageable and would have to be demolished. But preservation advocates convinced the port to give would-be developers a chance to do something with it.

A team composed of Zervas Group Architects and Tollhouse Energy proposes powering The Granary with electricity that could be generated by hydropower from the old Georgia-Pacific Corp. industrial water main.

"We believe The Granary must be developed first in order to create an irresistible synergy that will drive demand for more development," architect Michael Smith wrote in a cover letter to the port.

Bellingham developers John Blethen and James Willson, outspoken advocates for Granary preservation, also have expressed interest.

"Our vision for the structure is a mix of retail, restaurant and offices," they wrote. "It would be our intent to refurbish the building's exterior immediately upon acquisition."

The Canadian-based Molnar Group, current owner of the Hotel Bellwether, is more skeptical.

"Our current opinion is that the renovation of the Granary Building could be financially prohibitive," the firm writes. "However, we will keep an open mind."

Also among the skeptics is a submission from Lorig Associates and Lorax Partners of Seattle.

"The driver of the synergy we see coming to the waterfront, the excitement that turns heads, attracts tenants, and draws and expands the downtown will be anchored by the improvements to the waterfront and the new tenants and buildings that complement that edge," the Lorig-Lorax team wrote. "As a focus, the Granary is not the driver of the first step to redevelopment."

Utah-based Rockworth Companies expresses a willingness to consider the use of the Granary for its historic value, but says a decision can't be made until structural and architectural feasibility studies are done.

They envision ground-floor retail and public gathering space, office and residential areas on upper levels, and perhaps even an observation deck on top.

Other highlights from the preliminary developer submissions:

• Minneapolis-based Artspace Projects Inc. expresses a willingness to be involved in developing self-supporting live-and-work rental spaces for artists.

• Bellingham Whatcom County Housing Authorities is interested in securing a 1.25-acre portion of the site for 100 units of lower-cost housing.

• Rockworth proposes 300 to 400 higher-end rental housing units as the first phase of waterfront development, with amenities that could include parks and a community center with swimming pool and fitness center, thereby generating activity that would attract retail, office and hotel development.

• Seattle-based Touchstone expresses interest in an office building in the 100,000-to-250,000-square-foot size range, a possible 200-room hotel, and apartments.

• Molnar Group says demand for rental housing is high and proposes a five-story apartment building as a first step.

• P4 Solutions, a multinational group that includes local architect Dave Christensen, Realtor David Moody and businessman Charlie Heggem, envisions a four- or five-star hotel with more than 200 rooms that could complement a Western Washington University project and "world-class aquarium."

Lydia Bennett, the port's director of business development, said this is just a preliminary round to give port and city officials an idea of the level of developer interest in the waterfront, as the master planning process moves ahead.

While that process is under way at City Hall, the port will be undertaking more serious discussions with developers and investors, seeking formal development proposals that would be submitted in May 2013. By the end of this year, the port hopes to have a developer or developers contractually committed to purchase the 10.8-acre property and develop it.

Developers can be involved in the final development of the master plan to make sure it is compatible with their needs, Bennett added.

Matt Anderson, principal with the Heartland LLC consulting group working with the port to recruit developers, said Bellingham appears to have a strong brand.

"The perception of Bellingham outside the area is really very strong," Anderson said. "People say, 'I love Bellingham.' I must have heard that a dozen times."

Anderson said he hasn't heard any concern about waterfront rail traffic that could be generated if the Gateway Pacific Terminal coal export pier is built at Cherry Point.

"Everybody knows about the trains," Anderson said. "It's certainly something to watch, but right now it's not foremost on peoples' minds."

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

MORE PHOTOS
CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Port expects Bellingham waterfront proposals by mid-July

    BELLINGHAM - Prospects for a central waterfront renaissance should be clear by mid-July, when the Port of Bellingham expects to receive serious proposals from developers interested in a 10.8-acre portion of the site in and around the Granary building next to Whatcom Waterway.

    On Wednesday, May 15, port officials sent out a 30-page "request for proposals" to developers, who have until July 10 to provide their plans for waterfront projects, as well as evidence of their financial ability to carry out those plans. That includes the money to buy or lease waterfront development sites from the port at market rates.

    Interested developers have been invited to submit proposals for all or part of the 10.8 acre portion at the northeast end of the 237-acre waterfront site, much of which was formerly occupied by the Georgia-Pacific Corp. pulp and paper mill.

  • Port of Bellingham, city have new strategy for building up waterfront

    BELLINGHAM - When the Port of Bellingham acquired the Georgia-Pacific Corp. pulp and paper mill site, the potential cost of environmental cleanup was a big, worrisome unknown.

    The port's preliminary estimate of that cost was $40.3 million, but nobody knew for sure the extent of contamination from decades of pulp and chemical operations that involved mercury, among other things, or what it would cost to deal with that contamination in a way the Washington Department of Ecology would accept.

    So in late 2004, before closing the deal with G-P, port officials arranged the purchase of a complex insurance policy to cover potential overruns.

  • Concern over big G-P building delays city-port deal on waterfront

    BELLINGHAM - After City Council member Jack Weiss raised concerns about possible demolition of the old digester building on the Georgia-Pacific Corp. mill site, the council agreed to a two-week delay on approval of a deal with the Port of Bellingham to move ahead on waterfront planning work.

    The council was being asked to approve an arrangement for sharing a $1.5 million state grant for waterfront work, awarded jointly to the port and city. The arrangement called for the port to spend its half of the money on removal of "inactive industrial structures" to prepare the area for streets, parks and eventual private investment. The city would use its half on planning and building Whatcom Waterway Park at the northwest end of the waterfront site.

    But Weiss noted that the specifics of the port's contract with the state Department of Commerce called for preliminary steps toward demolition of the 150-foot-tall digester building, a red brick structure that is the tallest on the old G-P pulp mill property the

  • Waterfront's impact on downtown Bellingham could be issue

    BELLINGHAM - The negative impacts of a booming waterfront on downtown businesses is emerging as a concern as waterfront redevelopment plans get public scrutiny.

    At a Thursday, May 9, session of the Bellingham Planning Commission, some commissioners said waterfront businesspeople have expressed fears about how a revitalized waterfront would affect them.

    "They are in fact worried that the city is turning a shoulder to downtown in favor of this new, glitzy project," said Planning Commission Chairman Tom Grinstad, an architect.

  • Bellingham, port officials strike back at Pike’s waterfront criticisms

    BELLINGHAM - The city's former mayor said those now in charge of coming up with a redevelopment plan for the waterfront aren't listening to the will of the community.

    "If you're an elected official, and the public overwhelmingly wants something, you should be responsive to the public," Dan Pike said on Thursday, Feb. 7, at a talk on past and present planning for the waterfront, part of the Huxley College of the Environment Speaker Series.

    He had an audience of about 200 people, many of them students, on the Western Washington University campus.