advertisement

tool name

close
tool goes here

Theaters want to sell film-goers liquor, wine

Small theaters such as The Grand Cinema in Tacoma are asking the Legislature to create a special liquor license that would allow them to serve beer and wine.

Published: Jan. 23, 2013 at 6:39 a.m. PSTUpdated: Jan. 23, 2013 at 10:10 a.m. PST
0 comments

Small theaters such as The Grand Cinema in Tacoma are asking the Legislature to create a special liquor license that would allow them to serve beer and wine.

A bill introduced by state Rep. Jim Moeller, D-Vancouver, aims to help small, historic theaters serve alcohol without requiring extensive food service on the premises or completely banning minors.

Should House Bill 1001 pass, the Grand “would seriously look at going down this path” of serving alcohol during film showings, said Mitch Robinson, president of the Grand’s board of directors.

“What our members tell us is they like the idea,” Robinson said last week. “You can imagine for certain kinds of movies, at certain times of night, it would really be appropriate.”

At a hearing last week before the House Government Accountability & Oversight Committee, several small theater owners from throughout Western Washington spoke in support of the bill, saying it would give them another source of revenue to help them compete with suburban multiplexes.

While some large multiplex theaters in Washington operate as dinner theaters under a restaurant liquor license, that kind of operation is beyond the reach of smaller theaters that have limited space and resources, proponents of the bill testified last week.

“It’s hard for us to compete,” said A.J. Epstein, who runs the West of Lenin theater in Seattle’s Fremont neighborhood. “We don’t have room for restaurants. We don’t have room for a dedicated space only for beer and wine service that can be basically a bar.”

Nonprofits like The Grand are eligible for a nonprofit license that would allow serving beer, wine and spirits, but often there is a great deal of confusion involved when conducting business using a nonprofit liquor license, said Thom Mayes, executive director of the Olympia Film Society. The Olympia Film Society has a nonprofit license to serve alcohol in the Capitol Theater downtown.

“There’s a major breakdown of communication between the Liquor Control Board, the distributors and the people that have the license,” Mayes said. “It took a lot of educating the people selling to us. We the people that have the license know what we are allowed to do, but no one else seems to.

“If there were a system where we could have a very clear permit, it would be easier for us.”

The Grand met with representatives from the state Liquor Control Board last year to see how the theater could go about serving drinks. The road forward was far from clear, Robinson said.

“When we explored how to apply for and get approval for this privilege, we discovered a myriad of setbacks due to the lack of a specific liquor license for a theater like ours,” wrote Robinson and Philip Cowan, the Grand’s executive director, in a letter supporting the bill. “We believe HB 1001 directly addresses this problem in an appropriate manner allowing for responsible businesses like ours, using a strict minor control plan, to provide beer and wine for our customers.”

The bill would require theaters to submit an alcohol control plan to the state Liquor Control Board explaining how they would prevent underage drinking.

Opponents of the bill said that putting alcohol in more places sets a negative example for young people.

“We now see sampling or the sale of alcohol at farmer markets, grocery stores, wedding boutiques, spas. … We think this sends the wrong message to our youth in that it normalizes the use of alcohol,” said Seth Dawson with the Washington Association for Substance Abuse Prevention.

Rep. Christopher Hurst, the Enumclaw Democrat who chairs the Government Accountability & Oversight Committee where the bill is scheduled for a vote on Thursday, said he thinks the proposal is a good idea that might need a few tweaks, such as adding language to require that theater employees be licensed to serve alcohol if they’re pouring drinks.

“We need to refine it just a little bit more, but I’m pretty sure we can address those concerns,” Hurst said.

Melissa Santos: 360-357-0209
msantos@theolympian.com

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Expanded access to liquor raises questions about consequences

    As lawmakers debate tougher drunken driving penalties following two fatal crashes in Seattle, some are also questioning whether the state should be expanding alcohol service in places such as day spas and movie theaters.

  • The liquor store hangover

    Early this year when the state put its network of liquor stores on the auction block, many small-business people saw it as their path to prosperity. Now, six months after liquor sales were privatized, many of those once-eager bidders, who collectively paid the state more than $31 million for the rights to the state’s former stores, have discovered their adventures in retailing are a road to ruination.

  • Inslee signs bills on alcohol at theaters, markets

    Gov. Jay Inslee has signed a handful of measures making it easier for certain businesses to serve alcohol.

  • Independent Tri-Cities liquor store faces closure because of state fees

    Independent liquor stores that opened after the state handed the reins of liquor sales to private companies seven months ago already are facing the threat of closure.

    New state fees on spirits have cut into the bottom line of small-business owners and increased prices. Many potential Tri-Cities customers are driving to Oregon for cheaper booze.

    At the same time, big box stores such as Costco are eligible for quantity discounts under Initiative 1183 that smaller stores don't qualify for, making it harder to compete with chain grocery stores and pharmacies.

  • Olympia distributors seek delay of single-serve ban

    The Washington Beer & Wine Distributors Association is asking the city of Olympia to hold off on pursuing a mandatory ban on certain single-serve alcohol drinks and allow local distributors to voluntarily stop distributing the adult beverages.