tool name

close
tool goes here

Abortion bill revised to fix drafting error

After facing criticism that a bill purporting to mandate parental notification for minors seeking abortions would also place long-existing abortion rights in the state at risk, Republican lawmakers on Monday introduced revisions narrowing the bill’s scope.

Published: Jan. 29, 2013 at 6:43 a.m. PST
0 comments

After facing criticism that a bill purporting to mandate parental notification for minors seeking abortions would also place long-existing abortion rights in the state at risk, Republican lawmakers on Monday introduced revisions narrowing the bill’s scope.

In its original form, Senate Bill 5156 would have repealed two laws passed by voter initiative in 1991 codifying in state law that women have the right to seek abortions and that doctors have the right to perform them.

By extension, the bill would have made doctors performing abortions in the state guilty of a class C felony, punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine of up to $10,000, in the event that federal laws allowing abortion are reversed.

Sen. Mike Padden, R-Spokane Valley, a bill sponsor, said that the state’s code revisers office, a nonpartisan body that helps draft and review bills to make sure they are consistent with existing statutes, recommended that the two laws be repealed in order to avoid any possible conflict with a new definition of abortion contained in the bill.

That definition, which Padden described as “broader and more-up-to date” than the state’s current one, explicitly included the use of any drug, substance or device with the intent to end a pregnancy and “with reasonable likelihood cause the death of the unborn child.”

In the revised version of the bill, both the new definition of abortion and the repeal of existing law are eliminated.

In an email to Padden, Code Reviser K. Kyle Thiessen said that repealing one of the laws would have recast a third law to criminalize doctors performing abortions.

“(N)othing in your bill request shows any intent to expand the criminal penalty” for performers of abortion, Thiessen wrote, adding that the bill’s doing so “was an unintentional drafting error.”

Padden said that it was never his plan that the bill do anything more than require pregnant minors to consult with a parent before being eligible for an abortion.

“It’s unfortunate there was a drafting error, but it’s been corrected and it’s part of the legislative process,” Padden said.

A bill hearing is set for Feb. 6.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • March for Life participants hear about abortion-related legislation

    Thousands of anti-abortion demonstrators gathered on the steps of the Legislative Building and the Temple of Justice in Olympia on Tuesday to remind state lawmakers that they’re watching.

  • March for Life hears about abortion bills

    Thousands of anti-abortion demonstrators gathered on the steps of the Legislative Building and the Temple of Justice in Olympia on Tuesday to remind state lawmakers that they’re watching.

  • Legal challenges begin against ND abortion laws

    Abortion rights activists on Wednesday filed the first of what they expect will be several legal challenges to laws recently approved in North Dakota that would make that state the most restrictive in the country for women to terminate their pregnancies.

  • State Democrats try again on abortion coverage

    Democratic state lawmakers are renewing a push that fell short a year ago that would require Washington insurers to pay for abortions, in addition to the maternity care they’re already mandated to provide.

  • Local teens back parental-notification bill in Legislature

    Sixteen-year-old Janet Kruschke told state senators Wednesday about the pain someone close to her went through after having two abortions.

    That woman, now in her 50s, still struggles physically and emotionally with those decisions, she told lawmakers. The older woman had an abortion when she was 14, without the knowledge of her parents, Janet said during a hearing of the Senate Law & Justice Committee.

    And that's why the Tri-Cities Prep sophomore, along with friend and Prep junior Mary Hoppes, 17, told lawmakers they support a bill requiring minors to tell their parents at least 48 hours before they have an abortion.