The maker of Zoloft is being sued in an unusual case alleging the popular antidepressant has no more benefit than a dummy pill. The federal lawsuit, filed in California, argues that patients who took it should be reimbursed for their costs.
Zoloft’s maker, Pfizer Inc., disagrees. It says clinical studies and the experience of millions of patients and their doctors over two decades prove Zoloft is effective. Pfizer and four psychiatry experts interviewed by The Associated Press call the lawsuit frivolous. But the plaintiff, Laura Plumlee, said Zoloft didn’t help her during three years of treatment. Her attorney, R. Brent Wisner, argues the FDA shouldn’t have approved Zoloft because Pfizer didn’t publish some studies that found the drug about as effective as a placebo.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.