tool name

close
tool goes here

Naming rights could alleviate, not solve funding shortages

Would you support renaming the Tacoma Narrows Bridge if it kept tolls from rising higher than they otherwise would?

Published: Feb. 4, 2013 at 12:05 a.m. PST
0 comments

Would you support renaming the Tacoma Narrows Bridge if it kept tolls from rising higher than they otherwise would?

What if it were renamed the Taco Bell Narrows Bridge and only kept the toll from increasing, say, by 25 cents?

It’s that kind of question that lawmakers must consider with House Bill 1050 and 1051, which would allow naming rights for public facilities and transportation infrastructure, respectively. Both are prime-sponsored by state Rep. Jan Angel, R-Port Orchard; HB 1051 is co-sponsored by freshman Rep. Linda Kochmar, R-Federal Way.

Angel’s main motivation for supporting naming rights is to provide some toll relief for Narrows Bridge commuters.

‘That’s a worthy goal; the round-trip toll is slated to increase from the current $4 to $6 in 2015. But it’s doubtful that the sale of naming rights would put much of a dent in the $45 million the state owes annually in debt payment. If the toll relief isn’t more than a pittance, would it be worth giving the bridge a name that might become the target of jokes?

Naming rights could have a much more significant impact on a smaller scale. For instance, it’s costly to maintain highway rest stops and state parks; selling the naming rights to these highly visible sites could provide much-needed revenue. The public is likely to support naming rights if it meant those facilities would be well-maintained and not threatened with closure.

Selling naming rights is something the public is already familiar with: KeyArena, Safeco Field and CenturyLink Field are all examples in the region. People often come up with their own nicknames to take the commercial edge off the names: The Safe and The Clink, for example.

Angel’s legislation forbids names that are indecent, religious or political, or that promote tobacco, alcohol, marijuana or illegal drugs. In naming transportation infrastructure, at least one public hearing would be required.

Both bills limit naming rights to five years, so no permanent damage would be done if the name turns out to be a dud. In tough economic times, with money short for maintaining important public facilities, it makes sense to give naming rights a shot – in limited cases.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Lawmakers fear names like Chuck E. Cheese Bridge

    An idea to sell the naming rights for public facilities to help pay for their operation has some lawmakers concerned that Washington state could end up with a “CenturyLink Capitol Building” or a “Chuck E. Cheese Bridge.”

  • House committees hear Angel’s bills to allow naming rights

    Imagine crossing the Boeing Tacoma Narrows Bridge, driving across Lake Washington on the Microsoft 520 span, or having a picnic in the Amazon Deception Pass State Park. It could happen under legislation being considered by House committees in Olympia.

  • Fiscal reality behind likely bridge toll hike

    Math is unforgiving. Just ask Tacoma Narrows Bridge commuters, who likely will face yet another toll increase to cross the eastbound portion of the span.

  • Some fear selling naming rights could get absurd

    A proposal that aims to offset rising toll costs on the Tacoma Narrows bridge by selling its naming rights has some lawmakers concerned the local icon could turn into “The Chuck E. Cheese Bridge.”

  • Listen to the people: No toll increases on Narrows Bridge

    How many more emails, letters, phone calls, news articles, radio programs, television interviews, e-newsletters, public hearings, bills, amendments and opinion-editorials are required before the state finally understands the citizens I represent in the 26th Legislative District cannot afford higher tolls on the Tacoma Narrows Bridge? What else is required to stop tolls from rising?