Three weeks into a new legislative session, top Washington lawmakers say it is too early to know if two dozen labor contracts negotiated by then-Gov. Chris Gregoire can be honored.
At stake is the pay for all of the state’s roughly 105,000 employees, including those at colleges and universities. Total cost for the pay adjustments is about $238 million — much of that needed to end the temporary 3 percent pay cuts of the past two years that affected most of the state’s nearly 60,000 general-government employees.
The projected pay hikes are part of a potential $1 billion shortfall facing the state for 2013-15, a deficit that also includes another $360 million for cost-of-living increases for teachers.
Making the outlook a bit cloudy for budget writers is the state Supreme Court’s ruling last year that the state is underfunding public schools. That could put the state on the hook for $1.4 billion more in spending.
So far, the Republican-backed majority in the Senate is insisting that no new taxes are needed to write a budget under those terms. At the same time, the Senate coalition’s leaders are refusing to say if paying state employees more after years of pay cuts and furloughs is a priority.
“We haven’t even had that discussion yet, whether we accept it or reject it,” Senate Republican Leader Mark Schoesler of Ritzville said last week. “That’s a discussion we’ll have as we move into the budget. Historically, we’ve never had a choice. If you accepted the budget, you accepted the contract.’’
In the House, Democrats are also avoiding a firm commitment, although the mood is decidedly warmer to raising pay rates.
Two years ago, lawmakers knew 10 days into the session that they would accept the contracts, says House Appropriations Chairman Ross Hunter, D-Medina. This year is different, and a part of it is having a new governor who has yet to make clear his budget and pay priorities, as well as new budget leaders in the Senate.
As the purchasing power of state employees shrinks after furloughs and four years without cost-of-living raises, Hunter said, some talented workers are going to greener pastures — in the private sector and even to local governments that pay better.
“We have not given people raises. And it’s beginning to be a problem. We are beginning to lose staff,” Hunter said..
Also hoping for more money are home-care workers who won an arbitration award giving 50-cent raises in each of the next two years — worth about 10 percent over the period.
The arbitration award is worth more than $125 million, by Office of Financial Management estimates. But the workers union, Service Employees International Union 775, wants additional funding to cover employees who do not belong to the union to avoid a two-tier pay scale in home care.
The union plans a caregiver lobby day Thursday in Olympia and is bringing 400 of the low-paid employees who tend to the elderly, sick and disabled in their homes.
“The last time there was a Republican Senate majority, they funded our contract,’’ Holtz said. “We’re still meeting with each legislator to talk about it and help them to appreciate what caregivers do and why it is they need a 50-cent raise.”
Brad Shannon: 360-753-1688 bshannon@theolympian.com
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.