tool name

close
tool goes here

Duke Energy to retire idle Crystal River nuclear plant

Duke Energy announced Tuesday that it will close Progress Energy’s idled Crystal River nuclear reactor in Florida.

Published: Feb. 5, 2013 at 9:56 a.m. PST
0 comments

Duke Energy announced Tuesday that it will close Progress Energy’s idled Crystal River nuclear reactor in Florida.

The company is reviewing alternatives to replace the power produced by the plant, including possibly constructing a natural gas-fueled plant to meet the needs of its Florida customers. Duke is evaluating several potential sites for the project.

The Crystal River plant has been shut down since 2009 after a botched component-replacement project cracked concrete in its reactor containment structure. Duke had been mulling over whether to repair the plant, at an estimated cost of $1.5 billion to $3.4 billion, or retire it.

“We believe this decision to retire the nuclear plant is in the best overall interests of our customers, investors, the state of Florida and our company,” Duke CEO Jim Rogers said in a statement. “This has been an arduous process of modeling, engineering, analysis and evaluation over many months. The decision was very difficult, but the right choice.”

Duke also announced Tuesday that it has reached a solution with the insurer, Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, known as NEIL, about claims to be paid as a result of the damages that occurred at Crystal River. Under the terms of a mediator’s proposal, NEIL will pay $530 million in addition to the $305 million it has already paid. Duke said the $835 million payout is the largest in NEIL’s history.

The troubles at Progress’ Crystal River reactor were cited by Rogers and other Duke board members as one of the reasons that Duke moved to fire Progress CEO Bill Johnson just hours after Duke and Progress completed their merger last summer. Johnson had been slated to lead the combined Duke after the merger, but Duke’s board said Progress’ poor nuclear performance in recent years reflected badly on his leadership.

Duke’s board became particularly concerned about missed deadlines and rising costs at Crystal River after the merger between Duke and Progress was proposed, Duke’s lead director Ann Maynard Gray said during testimony before the N.C. Utilities Commission.

Duke reported in November that subsidiary Progress Energy Florida would record a $100 million charge against third-quarter income from its Crystal River nuclear plant.

An agreement the Florida Public Service Commission approved in February triggered the expected $100 million charge. Progress agreed to refund to customers $40 million in 2015 and $60 million in 2016 if repairs don’t begin by the end of this year – the money paid for replacement power while Crystal River was not operating.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • NC nuclear plant shut down after crack discovered

    A nuclear plant near North Carolina's capital city was shut down after operators reviewing ultrasonic tests from last year found the results showed tiny marks of corrosion and cracking that need repair, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said.

  • Correction: Nuclear Plant Shutdown-NC story

    In a story May 16 about a shutdown at the Shearon Harris nuclear power plant, The Associated Press reported erroneously that the reactor vessel contains superheated steam. The vessel covers the nuclear core, which produces heat. The heat is converted to steam later in the process to produce electricity.

  • Studies mull impact of closing nuclear power plant near Richland

    The low cost of power in the Mid-Columbia could mean that power produced by the plant could be replaced economically if Energy Northwest’s Columbia Generating Station retired early, according to Physicians for Social Responsibility. The plant’s license was approved last year to operate through 2043.

  • Studies mull impact of closing nuclear plant

    Washington and Oregon chapters of Physicians for Social Responsibility have commissioned an economic study of the possibility of shutting down the nuclear power plant near Richland.

    The low cost of power in the Mid-Columbia could mean that power produced by the plant could be replaced economically if Energy Northwest's Columbia Generating Station retired early, according to the group. The plant's license was approved last year to operate through 2043.

    However, Bonneville Power Administration and Energy Northwest said a study they are conducting of a temporary or permanent shutdown of the plant shows that would increase the cost of power for the region.

  • Environmentalists praise fed ruling on San Onofre

    A federal panel Monday sided with environmentalists who have called for lengthy hearings on a plan to restart the ailing San Onofre nuclear power plant - a decision that further clouds the future of the twin reactors.