tool name

close
tool goes here

DOE weighs sequestration furloughs at Hanford

The Department of Energy is closely examining contracts as the threat looms for sequestration-driven spending cuts March 1, according to a new memo from Daniel Poneman, deputy energy secretary.

Published: Feb. 8, 2013 at 10:06 a.m. PSTUpdated: Feb. 8, 2013 at 10:06 a.m. PST
0 comments

The Department of Energy is closely examining contracts as the threat looms for sequestration-driven spending cuts March 1, according to a new memo from Daniel Poneman, deputy energy secretary.

It's also considering placing employees on furlough -- a temporary unpaid leave -- or taking other actions to slash personnel costs, the memo said.

Unless Congress amends the law, President Obama is required to issue a sequestration order in three weeks to cut about $85 billion from fiscal 2013 spending.

At Hanford, the cut could range from 7 percent to 10 percent of spending.

The DOE Hanford Richland Operations Office has received no direction for formal action for sequestration, but that could come in the next few weeks, said Jonathan "J.D." Dowell, DOE assistant manager for river and plateau. His comments came Thursday at the Hanford Advisory Board meeting in Richland.

DOE will try to avoid cutting jobs, but budgets already are tight and there are not a lot of options, he told the board.

Any cuts would be to existing environmental cleanup work, because the schedule for required work already has been squeezed as much as possible, he said.

After the meeting, DOE spokesman Cameron Hardy said DOE has become as efficient as possible to get the most cleanup work done by its Hanford contractors with the money available.

Just as spending more money now cuts costs later, delaying work makes cleanup more expensive, he said.

After Hanford received almost $2 billion in Recovery Act money, the annual report showing the cost of Hanford work yet to be completed, cut long-term costs by $4 billion, he said.

The DOE senior leadership team is doing extensive planning to determine how to deal with sequestration, Poneman said in his memo.

In addition to examining contracts, DOE also will look at grants and other spending across the department, according to Poneman.

"In many cases, this could mean making cuts to vital programs or curtailing spending on contracts," he said in the memo.

Other options will include cutting travel, training, facility and supply costs, he said.

If furloughs are needed, employees would be provided at least 30 days notice, he said.

The Obama administration continues to work with Congress to reach agreement on a balanced deficit reduction plan that avoids sequestration cuts, he said.

"Should these cuts occur, they would be harmful not only to our agency, but to critical domestic and defense priorities across the government and across the country," he said in the memo.

Sequestration is the penalty for the failure of a special congressional deficit committee to reach agreement. It was set to start Jan. 2 but was delayed until March through passage of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Data shows DOE needs to cut $171 million at Hanford

    The Department of Energy needs to cut $171 million from Hanford spending because of forced federal budget cuts called sequestration, according to updated information given Tuesday to Washington Gov. Jay Inslee.

    That does not include some possible impacts to subcontractors, Inslee was told in a letter from DOE Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman.

    The largest cut will be to work managing 56 million gallons of radioactive waste held in aging underground tanks and to build the $12.2 billion vitrification plant to treat the waste for disposal. Those projects, both under the DOE Hanford Office of River Protection, will see an estimated reduction of $92 million.

  • Hanford workers stuck in limbo as sequestration starts today

    Hanford contractors have told their employees they don't know what to expect with forced budget cuts, called sequestration, that are set to start today.

    However, some employees might get news soon of layoffs or unpaid leave.

    "We're currently assessing the potential impacts at Hanford and will know more early next week," said Cameron Hardy, DOE Hanford spokesman. "We anticipate impacts to our contractor work force, various projects and programs and a number of subcontracts for cleanup work at Hanford."

  • Hastings urges DOE not to shift Hanford money away from Hanford

    Don't shift money from Hanford to other Department of Energy environmental cleanup sites, Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., has warned DOE.

    That would be "met with my strongest opposition," he said in a letter sent Monday to Dave Huizenga, DOE senior adviser for environmental management.

    DOE is expected to submit a reprogramming package for environmental cleanup programs to Congress, proposing switching money among specific programs or sites for the remaining months of fiscal 2013. The year ends Sept. 30.

  • Forced cuts may hit hard at Hanford

    Hanford will need to cut more than $156 million from its spending between now and the end of the year under forced federal budget cuts, or sequestration, that took effect Friday.

    The cuts are estimated to affect up to 4,700 of Hanford's almost 9,000 employees, either with forced time off or, in some cases, layoffs.

    The Department of Energy Hanford Richland Operations Office needs to cut $78 million from its spending. The other DOE Hanford office, the Office of River Protection, is expected to have to cut its spending by at least $79 million and most likely more.

  • Hanford vit plant could face furloughs this summer

    Bechtel National is considering closing down the vitrification plant project for two weeks this summer because of a possible lack of money.

    Nonunion employees would be furloughed -- required to take paid or unpaid time off -- for those two weeks. Union employees in most cases would not be allowed to work and earn pay, either.

    However, if the Department of Energy moves ahead with reprogramming money in the fiscal 2013 budget, the furloughs might be avoided.