tool name

close
tool goes here

National Guard armory proposed on Hanford land

Published: Feb. 12, 2013 at 7:09 a.m. PSTUpdated: Feb. 12, 2013 at 1:17 p.m. PST
0 comments
The National Guard is interested in building an armory on Hanford land situated west of the HAMMER Training Facility and the Patrol Training Academy. (BOB BRAWDY/Tri-City Herald)

The Washington National Guard is proposing to use 5,000 acres of Hanford land to develop an armory and training grounds.

It has requested a 25-year or longer license from the Department of Energy that would give it permission to use land on the southern end of Hanford. The acreage is immediately west of the Hanford Patrol Academy and HAMMER training center and east of Hanford's Route 10.

The proposal is part of a larger plan for closing down older armories that are more costly to maintain and could include classrooms, offices and storage in addition to land for training maneuvers, said Capt. Joseph Siemandel in Spokane.

The Guard would build helicopter landing pads and develop gravel roads and personnel staging areas, Major General Bret Daugherty said in a letter to DOE sent early this month. The gravel roads would be used for wheeled vehicles, but not heavy tracked equipment.

The location would provide opportunities for DOE and the National Guard to share training resources, the letter said. A memorandum of understanding would be developed to coordinate activities between the agencies.

"The opportunity to work with DOE is huge to us," Siemandel said.

The Guard already trains at DOE's HAMMER. There also is potential for the Guard to use the Hanford Patrol Training Academy, which includes weapons bunkers, a driving track, rifle ranges, a range instruction shooting simulator, classrooms and a live-fire shooting house on 7,500 acres. HAMMER has training structures such as a building with interchangeable mazes for search and rescue, a six-story building for rescue training and a pad with a propane-fueled fire.

An armory at Hanford would allow National Guard members from the Tri-City area to drill closer to home and might help with recruiting, Siemandel said.

The 5,000 acres the National Guard is interested in using are planned for industrial use when they are no longer needed by DOE. There are no Hanford facilities on the land, DOE spokesman Geoff Tyree said. Most of the 586-square-mile nuclear reservation is planned to be used for preservation and conservation.

An armory would be considered compatible with the industrial use called for in the Hanford Comprehensive Land Use Plan, Tyree said.

DOE will consider the request and prepare a National Environmental Policy Act study report, which the public may comment on when a draft is finished, he said.

There could be benefits for the Department of Energy and the Tri-Cities if a National Guard armory is developed, Tyree said. DOE sees the potential to share some of the $500,000 annual cost of maintaining the Hanford Patrol Academy. There also could be opportunities for the Hanford patrol and federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to use the National Guard facility.

DOE discussed the proposal Thursday with the city of Richland, the Tri-City Development Council and the tribes.

TRIDEC has just started looking at the proposal and its viability, said Gary Petersen, TRIDEC vice president of Hanford programs.

TRIDEC, working with Benton County, the city of Richland and the Port of Benton, already has requested 1,341 acres of Hanford land north of Richland on the northwest corner of Horn Rapids Road and Stevens Drive to be used for industrial development. DOE is evaluating that and additional acreage with the goal of studying the environmental impacts of transferring 1,341 acres.

The acreage could support new industry that would contribute to the tax base and employ an estimated 2,400 to 3,500 workers, helping create jobs as environmental cleanup at Hanford is completed, according to TRIDEC.

It's not clear how the National Guard proposal and TRIDEC request would affect each other, said Gary Ballew, economic development manager for the city of Richland.

Richland will need more information on the exact location of the acreage the National Guard is interested in, he said. The city also will need more information on what the National Guard would build, what employment it would offer, the duration of the license for the Hanford land and what would happen to the land after the license expires, he said.

No schedule for developing a possible armory at Hanford has been set, according to the National Guard.

-- Annette Cary: 582-1533; acary@tricityherald.com; Twitter: @HanfordNews

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Hastings urges DOE not to shift Hanford money away from Hanford

    Don't shift money from Hanford to other Department of Energy environmental cleanup sites, Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., has warned DOE.

    That would be "met with my strongest opposition," he said in a letter sent Monday to Dave Huizenga, DOE senior adviser for environmental management.

    DOE is expected to submit a reprogramming package for environmental cleanup programs to Congress, proposing switching money among specific programs or sites for the remaining months of fiscal 2013. The year ends Sept. 30.

  • Energy secretary nominee Moniz says no more Hanford status quo

    Energy secretary nominee Ernest Moniz said maintaining the status quo at the Hanford nuclear reservation is not acceptable, at a Senate Natural Resources Committee hearing.

  • Hanford museum CREHST faces difficult time as it merges with Reach interpretive center

    A drive down Richland's George Washington Way about a year from now no longer will provide a glimpse of the vintage cream and maroon Hanford buses parked outside the CREHST museum.

    The museum, after about 18 years in the Tri-Cities, will close about the time the new Hanford Reach Interpretive Center opens.

    The museum already is entering a final year of change.

  • Tri-City Raceway plan on track for success

    West Richland and Port of Kennewick officials hope to make the former Tri-City Raceway into one of the region's next economic development success stories.

    The dream of transforming the 93 acres into a wine-inspired development faces a couple of major hurdles, however.

    The first is West Richland's urban growth boundaries, which prohibit the port from connecting to the city's water and sewer lines on the corner of the raceway property.

  • Richland buys undeveloped land back from ConAgra

    A swath of land next to the Shilo Inn at Columbia Point is back in Richland's hands about three years after the city sold it to ConAgra Foods Lamb Weston.

    The company once intended to construct an office building at the site, but those plans eventually changed.

    Richland had negotiated the right to buy back the land for the 2010 sale price of about $1.43 million if development didn't happen, according to city documents.