tool name

close
tool goes here

Audit: Mississippi improperly diverted dollars meant to prevent alcohol-related crashes

Despite recording the nation’s third highest fatality rate from alcohol-related vehicle crashes, Mississippi has improperly diverted millions of federal highway grant dollars designated for addressing the problem, the U.S. Transportation Department’s inspector general has found.

Published: Feb. 15, 2013 at 4:44 a.m. PSTUpdated: Feb. 15, 2013 at 4:44 a.m. PST
0 comments

Despite recording the nation’s third highest fatality rate from alcohol-related vehicle crashes, Mississippi has improperly diverted millions of federal highway grant dollars designated for addressing the problem, the U.S. Transportation Department’s inspector general has found.

In an audit issued last week, the inspector general harshly criticized the state’s transportation department, estimating that of $45 million that was paid to Mississippi from fiscal 2007 to 2010 for highway safety, more than $7 million was improperly channeled to state and local law enforcement agencies for use in general enforcement, such as curbing speeding or seat-belt violations.

It said that 93 of 127 state and local police officers whose federally funded activities were reviewed did not issue any citations for driving while intoxicated (DUI) during the period analyzed.

The audit was the latest round in a six-year battle between the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, known as the NHTSA, and Mississippi officials over what the agency described as the state’s “weak financial management controls and poor conformance with grant requirements,” the audit found.

In 2011, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration designated Mississippi as the nation’s only “high-risk grantee” because of its lax compliance with the federal grant conditions.

While NHTSA officials requested the audit, auditors also criticized the agency itself for weak oversight of Mississippi’s handling of federal highway safety dollars.

Mississippi has the highest rate of vehicle fatalities in the nation, in addition to its soaring incidence of alcohol-related traffic deaths, NHTSA said.

Because it is one of 11 states that have yet to pass laws barring open containers in vehicles, federal law requires that 3 percent of its federal-aid highway construction funds be shifted to highway safety programs that create countermeasures to alcohol-impaired driving or focus on enforcement of drinking and driving laws or “hazard elimination activities.”

As a result, in addition to receiving $20.8 million in highway safety money from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration over the four-year audit period, the state transferred $36.3 million in federal highway construction funds to programs aimed at curbing drunken driving.

Auditors examined a statistical sample of $10.4 million of $45.3 million reimbursed to the state during the four-year span and identified $102,218 in improper payments.

Based on statistical projection, the report said, the Mississippi Office of Highway Safety claimed about $7.1 million in reimbursements for ineligible expenditures over the four years.

For example, the report said, only 147, or 5 percent, of the 2,926 citations that 127 officers issued were for DUI violations.

Because the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has issued no standard or target for how many DUI citations an officer should issue, the auditors set a baseline of one citation for every two eight-hour work shifts, a standard that NHTSA officials deemed reasonable.

It said that only 21 of the 127 officers met that threshold. During a four-week period, one officer issued 26 DUI citations, while another issued none, the auditors reported.

Following completion of the audit, the report said, NHTSA informed auditors that the state Office of Highway Safety had taken actions to correct weaknesses in its internal controls, including hiring a new finance manager and agreeing to add an auditor to its staff this year.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • On fatal crash anniversary, feds urge states to get tougher on drunken driving

    The National Transportation Safety Board recommended Tuesday that states lower their threshold for drunken driving with the goal of reducing alcohol-related fatal crashes, which have held steady for much of the past 15 years.

  • Correction: Drunken Driving-Zero Deaths story

    In a story May 17 about a National Transportation Safety Board recommendation on a blood alcohol threshold for drivers, The Associated Press incorrectly reported the definition of a drink. The standard definition of a drink is 12 ounces of beer, 5 ounces of wine and 1.5 ounces of 80-proof alcohol.

  • Tougher drunken driving threshold recommended

    States should cut their threshold for drunken driving by nearly half- from .08 blood alcohol level to .05-matching a standard that has substantially reduced highway deaths in other countries, a federal safety board recommended Tuesday. That's about one drink for a woman weighing less than 120 pounds, two for a 160-pound man.

  • Mistake leads to recall of some Chevy, GMC trucks

    A welding error by a supplier has forced the recall of 119,000 Chevrolet Colorado and GMC Canyon trucks from the 2010 through 2012 model years, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

  • Senate considers: If no one’s behind the wheel, who’s driving?

    Cars that steer themselves through bumper-to-bumper traffic will hit the market by the end of this year, and self-parking vehicles aren’t far behind. Fully autonomous models that don’t need human drivers at all are less than a decade from dealerships. But laws lag behind the rise of the robo-car. At a Senate hearing Wednesday, lawmakers grappled with the policy implications and risks.