tool name

close
tool goes here

Wyoming coal company strikes export deal to use Cherry Point terminal

Published: Feb. 14, 2013 at 3:59 p.m. PSTUpdated: Feb. 25, 2013 at 10:39 a.m. PST
0 comments
A coal train waits near Portal Way in Ferndale Friday morning, Nov. 2, 2012, to cross the border. (PHILIP A. DWYER/THE BELLINGHAM HERALD)

A Wyoming mining company has signed an option agreement allowing it to ship up to 16 million tons of coal a year through Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point — if that project can get the regulatory approvals it needs.

Cloud Peak Energy said Wednesday's deal involving Gateway Pacific Terminal, proposed by SSA Marine of Seattle, will allow it to expand overseas sales amid weak domestic demand.

The company has mines in Wyoming and Montana. It shipped 4.4 million tons of coal to Asian customers in 2012.

In 2011, coal industry giant Peabody Energy made a similar deal with SSA, declaring an intent to export as much as 24 million tons of coal per year via the Cherry Point facility.

Together, Cloud Peak and Peabody could ship 40 million tons of coal via Gateway Pacific, the lion’s share of the terminal’s announced capacity of 48 million tons of coal. SSA has also announced its intention to build facilities that could handle another six million tons of other commodities, for a total capacity of 54 million tons of cargo per year.

At that level, the terminal would add 18 trains per day through Bellingham, including loaded trains headed to the terminal and empty trains returning to mines and other commodity sources.

Craig Cole, a Gateway Pacific spokesman, said the Cloud Peak deal should not be interpreted to mean that the terminal will handle only coal.

"The company continues to solicit customers for any of the commodities it can potentially ship," Cole said. "An investment of this magnitude can't be reliant on just one customer or just one commodity over time."

Cole acknowledged that coal is the most promising commodity under today’s market conditions, but he added that the company may have announcements about other export cargoes in the future.

Gateway Pacific faces years of environmental study, and regulatory agencies got more than 120,000 public comments during the first phase of the study process to determine what environmental issues need to be resolved. The project could begin commercial operations by 2018 if it can get approvals from Whatcom County, the Washington Department of Ecology and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, among other agencies.

Cloud Peak has a separate option agreement to ship 5 million tons of coal annually through a second Washington port, the Millennium Bulk Terminals in Longview. That terminal is also undergoing regulatory review, and both port proposals are strongly opposed by environmental groups.

The Cherry Point project has also stirred up opposition in the city of Bellingham, partly because of the increase in train traffic.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Coal booster says Cherry Point terminal is 'dead,' but foes aren't celebrating

    BELLINGHAM - Brian Schweitzer, a Democrat who recently stepped down after two terms as Montana governor, thinks the furious opposition to a Cherry Point coal export terminal means doom for the project.

    "There's so much resistance to the project in the community," Schweitzer said. "Unless that local resistance changes, coal is not going to be shipped at Cherry Point."

    Schweitzer was referring to SSA Marine's proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal, envisioned as a major new shipping point for export of coal and other bulk cargoes from a Whatcom County site between the BP Cherry Point refinery and the Alcoa Intalco Works aluminum smelter. While labor unions and business groups are supportive, the project has galvanized environmentalists, who predict health woes and traffic disruptions from coal trains, as well as global impacts from coal burning in Asia.

  • China’s hunger for American coal in doubt

    The push for mass coal exports from Washington state, already facing a huge environmental battle, also could get hit with slowing Chinese demand for coal shipments.

  • Sierra Club challenges coal spills from trains

    The Sierra Club and allied environmental organizations announced they may go to court to use the federal Clean Water Act to curb alleged spillage of dust and fragments from coal trains passing through the Columbia Gorge and other places in Washington, including Bellingham.

    At a Tuesday, April 2, news conference, Cesia Kearns, a Sierra Club spokeswoman, said BNSF Railway Co. and the coal producers who use its rails have been given formal notice of intent to sue.

    Under the terms of the Clean Water Act, the notice gives the companies 60 days to stop the Clean Water Act violations that environmentalists allege are ongoing. At that point, the groups could go to federal court to seek a binding order directing BNSF and the coal companies to curb violations, if the evidence justifies that.

  • Ranker battles bill that could smooth Cherry Point coal terminal's path

    Backers of a Washington state Senate bill calling for faster regulatory review of "basic commodity transportation" projects insist the measure has nothing to do with the Gateway Pacific Terminal coal export pier proposed for Whatcom County's Cherry Point.

    State Sen. Kevin Ranker is convinced otherwise.

    The bill, SB 5805, would amend language in an existing law meant to encourage "projects of statewide significance for economic development and transportation." Among other things, the amendments add language making "basic commodity transportation" projects eligible for faster regulatory review. Language in existing law orders local governments to cooperate with state officials and project proponents to speed up the regulatory process for qualifying economic development proposals.

  • State and federal agencies want sweeping review of proposed Cherry Point coal port

    State and federal agencies have joined project opponents in calling for a wide-ranging review of potential impacts from the Gateway Pacific Terminal project that SSA Marine hopes to build at Whatcom County's Cherry Point.

    SSA Marine and its allies have made it clear they would prefer an environmental impact statement that focuses on the immediate environs of the coal pier site itself, on industrial waterfront south of the BP Cherry Point Refinery.

    Environmental groups fighting the coal terminal, as well as people concerned about health and traffic impacts from coal trains, have demanded a broader review. They want an analysis that includes air pollution and climate change impact from coal burning, as well as assessment of rail traffic impacts from Wyoming and Montana mines to Cherry Point.