tool name

close
tool goes here

NRC to discuss possible US Ecology rule changes Thursday in Richland

Published: Feb. 18, 2013 at 12:00 a.m. PSTUpdated: Feb. 17, 2013 at 11:03 p.m. PST
0 comments

A meeting to discuss possible changes to rules governing US Ecology, a commercial low-level radioactive waste disposal facility, will be discussed in Richland by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

US Ecology is on land leased by Washington in central Hanford.

Proposed changes for all four of the commercial low-level waste sites in the nation include allowing performance assessments to take into account differences in location and environment when determining each site's ability to contain waste.

License requirements also will be expanded to address disposal of depleted uranium, which becomes hazardous over long periods of time.

The Washington state departments of Health and Ecology will hold meetings at 1:30 and 7 p.m. Thursday at the Department of Ecology's Nuclear Waste Program office 3100 Port of Benton Blvd., Richland.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Chemical society plans Pasco talk on Hanford vit plant

    PASCO -- A discussion of the Hanford vitrification plant being built to treat up to 56 million gallons of radioactive waste is planned at 10 a.m. Saturday.

    The Richland Section of the American Chemical Society is sponsoring the program in Room S-145 of the Columbia Basin College's Math/Science Building on its Pasco campus.

    Dan McDonald of the Washington State Department of Ecology will discuss the status of tank waste treatment, the risks associated with different waste forms and the state's role in designing and building the $12.2 billion plant.

  • West Richland meeting tonight on shoreline plan

    West Richland is in the process of updating its Shoreline Master Program as required by the Washington State Department of Ecology.

    There will be a public meeting at 5:30 p.m. today to discuss the lake, streams and wetlands within the city limits.

    The meeting is in the city council chamber next to the West Richland branch of the Mid-Columbia Libraries at 3801 W. Van Giesen St.

  • Watchdog groups oppose sending Hanford waste to New Mexico

    Sending up to 3.1 million gallons of radioactive waste to New Mexico for disposal is no solution to Hanford's leaking underground tanks, according to Hanford Challenge and two other groups focused on environmental issues.

    Hanford Challenge of Seattle, the Southwest Research and Information Center of Albuquerque, N.M., and the Natural Resources Defense Council's nuclear program in Washington, D.C., have sent a joint letter to Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

    A Department of Energy proposal to send some of Hanford's tank waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, or WIPP, near Carlsbad, N.M., is costly, unwise and illegal, said the letter.

  • Mystery of rising levels in Hanford tanks partly solved

    A constant drip, drip, drip has added about 3,300 gallons of water over 18 years to one of Hanford's underground tanks holding radioactive waste.

    Last year, an assessment of routine measurements in Hanford's 149 single-shell waste tanks found that the level of waste might be slowly rising in 52 of the tanks.

    Seven months later, the Department of Energy has answers about what might be going on in three of them.

  • Gregoire chose Boeing over cleaner water

    Entering her final year in office, former Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire found herself in a difficult spot. Indian tribes, powerful supporters of the governor, wanted stricter water pollution rules. Meanwhile, her powerful supporters in the aerospace industry – spearheaded by The Boeing Co. – were dead set against tightening the rules. Aerospace won.