tool name

close
tool goes here

Hanford's nuclear waste can't wait another 70 years

Set a deadline far in the future. Add 25 years. Maybe 50.

Published: Feb. 20, 2013 at 12:05 a.m. PST
0 comments

Set a deadline far in the future. Add 25 years. Maybe 50.

That’s the sluggishness with which the federal government – thanks in part to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid – has been dealing with the nation’s most radioactive nuclear waste. A truly scary amount of that waste is quietly seething in our own backyard, at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation.

A new leak at Hanford demonstrates the folly of strangling the safest disposal option in sight – deep burial in dry Nevada – while letting high-level nuclear waste pile up near rivers around the country in stopgap storage containers.

Hanford hosts 56 million gallons of hot reactor byproducts in 177 steel-walled underground tanks, some dating to the heyday of Betty Grable. Collectively, they’ve leaked an estimated 1 million gallons of waste into the desert soil, creating radioactive plumes that are gradually headed for the Columbia River.

The Department of Energy put a stop to the big leaks years ago by pumping out liquids from the tanks, leaving crusty, gooey, toxic sludges inside. Water has been penetrating one of these supposedly “stabilized” tanks. The lyrically named T-111 has reportedly resumed leaking at a rate of 150 to 300 gallons a year.

This is a reminder that the nation’s largest concentration of nuclear waste is stored under insanely makeshift conditions. The oldest tanks, including T-111, were engineered to last 20 years. They were built in 1943 and 1944.

Even Hanford’s newer, double-walled tanks – built between the late 1960s and early 1980s – are slowly rotting in the ground. One sprang a leak last fall.

The contents of all these rusty buckets had been destined for the infinitely safer repository at Yucca Mountain, Nev., whose design promises to hold public exposure to radiation to a tiny fraction of natural background levels for 1 million years. That project was headed for opening when Reid and an obliging Obama administration cut it out of the budget in 2010.

The chief prospect remaining for the decontamination of Hanford is a $12.3 billion plant that would “vitrify” the tank wastes into big glass cylinders ready for burial.

Work on the vitrification plant has been progressing at roughly the pace of the Tower of Babel. It is supposed to open in 2019, but then what? There’s no place to bury the cylinders.

The Energy Department took a quarter of a century to get Yucca Mountain so close to accepting Hanford’s most deadly waste. Now the whole process is being started from scratch. Democrats, especially from this state, should be making a much bigger stink about this raw political power play than they have been.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Single-shell tank at Hanford found to be leaking waste

    An underground single-shell tank at Hanford is leaking up to 300 gallons of radioactive waste a year, Washington Gov. Jay Inslee said Friday.

  • Mystery of rising levels in Hanford tanks partly solved

    A constant drip, drip, drip has added about 3,300 gallons of water over 18 years to one of Hanford's underground tanks holding radioactive waste.

    Last year, an assessment of routine measurements in Hanford's 149 single-shell waste tanks found that the level of waste might be slowly rising in 52 of the tanks.

    Seven months later, the Department of Energy has answers about what might be going on in three of them.

  • Watchdog groups oppose sending Hanford waste to New Mexico

    Sending up to 3.1 million gallons of radioactive waste to New Mexico for disposal is no solution to Hanford's leaking underground tanks, according to Hanford Challenge and two other groups focused on environmental issues.

    Hanford Challenge of Seattle, the Southwest Research and Information Center of Albuquerque, N.M., and the Natural Resources Defense Council's nuclear program in Washington, D.C., have sent a joint letter to Energy Secretary Steven Chu.

    A Department of Energy proposal to send some of Hanford's tank waste to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant, or WIPP, near Carlsbad, N.M., is costly, unwise and illegal, said the letter.

  • Senator wants Hanford answers

    YAKIMA — The new chairman of a key Senate committee asked for a federal investigation Tuesday into leaking underground waste tanks at the nation’s most contaminated nuclear site.

  • Kurion pitches new vitrification system for Hanford tank waste

    Kurion is proposing tank-side vitrification of radioactive waste as a way to address Hanford’s issues with leaking underground tanks.

    The small company, which has opened a 13,000-square-foot testing facility in Richland, is not proposing to replace the $12.2 billion vitrification plant being built at Hanford to treat up to 56 million gallons of radioactive waste now held in underground tanks.

    Instead, it is offering a supplemental treatment technology that it says could be ready to treat the low-activity radioactive waste that makes up the majority of the tank waste by late 2014.Kurion believes its system is a more flexible way to treat waste, because waste is vitrified into a stable glass form in small, customized batches.