The same modes of communication that have hooked us on the instant reply also can leave us feeling forgotten.
We send an email, a text or an instant chat message. We wait – and nothing happens. Or we make a phone call. Leave a voicemail message. Wait. Again, nothing.
We tend to assume it’s a snub, and sometimes it is.
Erica Swallow, a 26-year-old New Yorker, said she’s heard a former boyfriend brag about how many text messages he never reads. “Who does that?” she asked, exasperatedly.
These days, though, no response can mean a lot of things. Maybe some people don’t see messages because they prefer email and you like Twitter. Maybe we’re just plain overwhelmed, and can’t keep up with the constant barrage of communication.
Whatever the reason, it’s causing a lot of frustration. A recent survey by the Pew Internet & American Life Project found that 39 percent of cell phone owners say people they know complain because they don’t respond promptly to phone calls or text messages. A third of cell owners also have been told they don’t check their phones frequently enough.
It happens in love. It happens in business. It happens in families.
Last year, Terri Barr, a woman on Long Island, N.Y., with grown children, sent her son a birthday present – a $350 gift certificate for “a wonderful kayaking trip for six, lunch, wine, equipment,” she said.
She sent him an email with the details, but he didn’t respond. She said she then telephoned and texted him to tell him it was a present. He eventually sent a one-line email, she said, telling her he was too swamped to open her email gift right then.
Instant communication “can be wonderful – but also terrible,” said Barr, who shared the story more as a lament of modern communication than a reprimand of her son, whose busy work life, she acknowledged, often takes him overseas.
So this year, she sent him a birthday gift by snail-mail in a box. “He actually opened it,” she said, and they’ve been talking more frequently since then.
Many other people, though, sit waiting for responses that never come.
“That’s where the frustration lies – it’s in the ambiguity,” said Susannah Stern, a professor of communication studies at San Diego State University.
Though we often assume the worst, experts say we shouldn’t.
Frequently, they say, people simply – and unknowingly – choose the wrong way to contact someone.
“I admit to having often been lax with checking my work number voicemail, which has led to me not responding to people waiting for my reply,” said Janet Sternberg, an assistant professor of communication and media studies at Fordham University.
She’s also had technical glitches. For instance: thinking she’d sent a text message to someone overseas and then, when he didn’t respond, realizing she had his international number programmed incorrectly in her phone.
“The sheer management of all these devices and channels is exhausting and sometimes daunting, leaving less and less time for actual communication,” Sternberg said. “We connect more but communicate less, in many ways.”
That’s why many people say they have no choice but to prioritize – and to respond only to the most urgent messages.
Missed communications – and a lack of response – can cause “turbulence” in a relationship, said Dan Faltesek, an assistant professor of social media at Oregon State University. But, he adds, that’s not necessarily a bad thing.
“It can be a little awkward, but you should talk to people about how you like to talk,” Faltesek said. “Everyone will be happier when they say what the rules are.”
And it’ll go even more smoothly, he said, when people are willing to step outside their own favorite mode of communication to those preferred by the person they’re contacting.
“Use the reverse golden rule,” Faltesek advises. “Treat others the way they like to be treated.”
Finding ways to prioritize, and receive, the most important messages also helps.
San Francisco-based AwayFind Inc. is among companies that have developed applications that help filter email — in this instance, alerting users to important emails on their mobile devices.
In the end, we can’t possibly respond to everything, said Jared Goralnick, the company’s founder and CEO, who’s also part of a nonprofit group called the Information Overload Research Group, which looks for ways to deal with out-of-control communication.
As he sees it, it’s good to be responsive, “but not to set an expectation that you’ll be available for everything.”
“That’s just not sustainable,” he said.
In other words, if we’re going to keep our sanity, we’ll sometimes have to accept the no response.
Martha Irvine is a national writer for The Associated Press.
JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.