tool name

close
tool goes here

Visitor bureau supports closure of Vista Field

Published: Feb. 28, 2013 at 12:00 a.m. PST
0 comments

Redeveloping the Vista Field Airport is the best option for Tri-Cities' tourism industry, the Tri-Cities Visitor & Convention Bureau told the Port of Kennewick on Wednesday.

The visitor bureau's board sent a letter to the port in support of closing and redeveloping the small general aviation airport near the Three Rivers Convention Center in Kennewick.

The visitor bureau also is asking the port to make the decision about the airport's future instead of spending more money to put it to a public vote.

Kris Watkins, the bureau's president and CEO, told the Kennewick City Council this week that the vote was unanimous for closing the airport, although elected officials on the board abstained from voting.

The visitor bureau, Kennewick Public Facilities District and West Richland City Council have all told the port that developing the 113 acres into something other than an airport is in the best interest of the community.

So far, no public agencies have told the port that it should keep the airport open and invest in improving it.

The Tri-City Development Council and the Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce are expected to issue statements on the airport soon.

Port of Kennewick commissioners have asked the public for their views on Vista Field. In January, a draft study was released that explored closing the airport in favor of a mixed-use development or making Vista Field a premier airport.

The port has been struggling to find a way to revitalize the 90-acre airfield after deciding two years ago to keep it open in hopes of recruiting more businesses. A consulting firm was hired to do a $225,000 independent review after efforts to find an airport operator fell through.

The final report is expected in March.

The visitor bureau's letter said the services that Vista Field provides are available elsewhere in the community, so redevelopment would not force current users to go outside of the community.

"Due to its geographic location, there is much more potential for economic growth if Vista Field and the surrounding real estate are repurposed in a way to create increased commerce and job creation opportunities," said the letter.

The bureau's board encouraged the port to develop a detailed master plan laying out the best use of the land.

Being able to plan ahead for that area's development is exciting, Watkins told the Kennewick City Council.

"We are just running out of space and land at Vista Field," she said.

The Kennewick Public Facilities District's board also unanimously supported taking out the airport and developing it into uses that enhance the Three Rivers Campus, which includes the convention center, according to the facilities district's letter.

The visitor bureau agreed that plans to expand the convention center will create a demand in the area for more tourism-related businesses, such as restaurants, retail shops, attractions and hotels.

"Therefore redevelopment seems to be in the best interest of the community as a whole," the bureau wrote.

The West Richland City Council also unanimously agreed that redeveloping Vista Field was in the best interest of the city, which is within the Port of Kennewick's boundaries.

The Kennewick City Council has not taken a position on Vista Field's future. Kennewick Mayor Steve Young told the Herald that the council felt it would be inappropriate to take a position. Instead, the council will support the Port of Kennewick's decision on the property, which was once owned by the city.

Before the port commission voted in 2010 to keep the airport, Kennewick city officials asked the port to consider closing it so that the 90 acres near the city's key commercial and tourist district could be developed for other uses.

Young said the city at the time still had an agreement with the port about the property. Since then, the council has relinquished the agreement, at the port's request.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • TRIDEC, chamber of commerce tell Port of Kennewick it should close Vista Field

    Closing Vista Field Airport and redeveloping it appears to be the best option for the Tri-Cities, two more public agencies told the Port of Kennewick on Friday.

    The Tri-City Development Council and the Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce sent letters voicing their support for removing the small general aviation airport near the Three Rivers Convention Center in favor of mixed-use development.

    They echoed similar views shared by the Tri-Cities Visitor & Convention Bureau, Kennewick Public Facilities District and West Richland City Council. All said developing the 113 acres associated with Vista Field into something other than an airport was in the best interest of the community.

  • Former mayor Thomas Moak to run for Port of Kennewick seat

    Former Kennewick Mayor Thomas Moak's political days may not be over.

    Moak has announced plans to file to run this year for the Port of Kennewick seat now held by Gene Wagner, the board's longest serving member.

    Moak, who served on the Kennewick City Council from 1998-2009, criticized Wagner and the commission for not working to close Vista Field Airport sooner.

  • Port of Kennewick to discuss report on Vista Field today

    A report on Vista Field's future will be among the topics discussed by the Port of Kennewick today at 2 p.m. in the commission chambers at 350 Clover Island Drive.

    The report, released Friday, incorporates the public comments the port received on the airfield's future and an environmental impact statement. It's available for download at portofkennewick.org/airport.

    It still gives a list of three options for Vista Field: enhance the current facilities, redevelop the land for other uses, or make no changes.

  • Taxpayers divided on future of Vista Field

    Port of Kennewick taxpayers were just about evenly divided on the future of Vista Field Airport at the public hearing on the issue Thursday night.

    Some pilots and others agreed that the price tag on redeveloping the airport near the Three Rivers Convention Center is too high.

    Pilots said the small airport could be improved and made viable for less than the $42.6 million estimate in a recently released draft study.

  • Tri-City aviators move views on future of Vista Field Airport

    Most Tri-City aviators have moved from supporting an enhanced Vista Field Airport to endorsing a less-expensive airport option after hearing the improvements could cost $42.6 million, Port of Kennewick commissioners heard Tuesday.

    But Michael Mehaffy, project manager with consultant Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co., said the so-called no-action alternative that follows the 2011 airport master plan is something the consultants cannot recommend.

    The firm's recently finished study outlines three options: follow the 2011 Vista Field master plan, invest in a major expansion of the airport and its facilities, or close the airport and develop it for other uses.