tool name

close
tool goes here

Hanford workers stuck in limbo as sequestration starts today

Published: March 1, 2013 at 12:00 a.m. PSTUpdated: March 1, 2013 at 2:32 p.m. PST
0 comments
Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., center, tours the Hanford Nuclear Reservation in Richland, Wash., Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2013. (JAMIE FRANCIS/AP)

Hanford contractors have told their employees they don't know what to expect with forced budget cuts, called sequestration, that are set to start today.

However, some employees might get news soon of layoffs or unpaid leave.

"We're currently assessing the potential impacts at Hanford and will know more early next week," said Cameron Hardy, DOE Hanford spokesman. "We anticipate impacts to our contractor work force, various projects and programs and a number of subcontracts for cleanup work at Hanford."

A letter is expected to be sent from DOE to Washington Gov. Jay Inslee early next week giving more details on the effects of sequestration at Hanford.

Then, contractors might be sent letters detailing cost cuts, which should result in better information about potential delays to environmental cleanup and impacts to contractor workers and subcontractors.

Inslee has said that the sequestration could not come at a worse time, given news that six Hanford underground tanks have newly been discovered to be leaking underground waste.

The Tri-Cities, because of its economic dependence on Hanford, will be disproportionately affected by the across-the-board federal budget costs, he said at a news conference this week.

Department of Energy employees in the Tri-Cities are not expected to be laid off or forced to take furloughs, or unpaid leave, after DOE looked for savings in training, supplies, contracts, grants and expenditures in recent weeks.

However, "DOE contractors may need to take significant employment actions across the complex as a result of funding cuts," Deputy Energy Secretary Daniel Poneman said in a memo Thursday. "The specific impacts will depend upon those contractors' decisions, but we expect that thousands of contractor employees will likely be affected through work hour reductions or layoffs unless the sequester is remedied."

The almost 9,000 workers at Hanford mostly are employed by contractors, with several hundred working directly for DOE.

Because the law requires that budget cuts be spread evenly across DOE programs, DOE's flexibility to prioritize activities or lessen the impact of cuts is severely limited, Poneman said.

Hanford, as a defense environmental cleanup site, could fall under required cuts of 8 percent for defense programs. However, because the cuts must be made only during the last seven months of fiscal 2013, the effective percentage reductions could be about 13 percent, according to information released by the White House.

In updated information released Wednesday by the White House Office of Management and Budget, agencies were told that by now they should "be actively and continuously communicating with affected stakeholders -- including state, localities, tribal governments, federal contractors, federal grant recipients and federal employees -- regarding elements of the agency's planning that have a direct impact on these groups."

The most concrete information offered to date about possible sequestration effects at Hanford has come in a report by the House Appropriations Committee Democrats. It said that 1,000 Hanford workers could be furloughed for six weeks and environmental cleanup work would slow.

The White House memo also said some contracts might need to be canceled, but that agencies should minimize the impact on small businesses. It advised caution in hiring new workers, awarding bonuses and incurring new costs for training, conferences and travel.

If layoffs or furloughs are being considered for union workers, unions must be consulted before decisions are made and collective bargaining agreements followed, the memo said.

Hanford contractors sent out messages to their employees this week, some telling them to report to work Monday. Today is a day off for many Hanford employees.

Scenarios being considered include furloughs and layoffs, but without funding levels being known Thursday, the impacts could not be determined, several memos said. Contractors have been providing forecasts and information based on possible scenarios to DOE, but if decisions have been made they have not been made public.

Whether budget cuts remain in effect for a few weeks, months or the rest of the year is unknown, Bechtel National employees were told. It could be a few days to a few weeks before Bechtel receives guidance from DOE to determine the impact on the vitrification plant under construction, according to a memo sent to employees.

However, Bechtel considered the possibility of sequestration when it planned for the current fiscal year, the Bechtel memo to employees said.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Hanford pink slips coming today

    Hanford workers to be laid off because of budget cuts caused by sequestration should begin being notified Monday.

    Department of Energy contractors were continuing to work on adjusted budgets late last week, including the number of layoffs that would be required.

    More union than nonunion employees face job losses because collective bargaining agreements prevent contractors from forcing them to take time off, or furloughs, leaving layoffs as the remaining option for those workers.

  • Forced cuts may hit hard at Hanford

    Hanford will need to cut more than $156 million from its spending between now and the end of the year under forced federal budget cuts, or sequestration, that took effect Friday.

    The cuts are estimated to affect up to 4,700 of Hanford's almost 9,000 employees, either with forced time off or, in some cases, layoffs.

    The Department of Energy Hanford Richland Operations Office needs to cut $78 million from its spending. The other DOE Hanford office, the Office of River Protection, is expected to have to cut its spending by at least $79 million and most likely more.

  • Data shows DOE needs to cut $171 million at Hanford

    The Department of Energy needs to cut $171 million from Hanford spending because of forced federal budget cuts called sequestration, according to updated information given Tuesday to Washington Gov. Jay Inslee.

    That does not include some possible impacts to subcontractors, Inslee was told in a letter from DOE Deputy Secretary Daniel Poneman.

    The largest cut will be to work managing 56 million gallons of radioactive waste held in aging underground tanks and to build the $12.2 billion vitrification plant to treat the waste for disposal. Those projects, both under the DOE Hanford Office of River Protection, will see an estimated reduction of $92 million.

  • Hastings urges DOE not to shift Hanford money away from Hanford

    Don't shift money from Hanford to other Department of Energy environmental cleanup sites, Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., has warned DOE.

    That would be "met with my strongest opposition," he said in a letter sent Monday to Dave Huizenga, DOE senior adviser for environmental management.

    DOE is expected to submit a reprogramming package for environmental cleanup programs to Congress, proposing switching money among specific programs or sites for the remaining months of fiscal 2013. The year ends Sept. 30.

  • Hanford vit plant could face furloughs this summer

    Bechtel National is considering closing down the vitrification plant project for two weeks this summer because of a possible lack of money.

    Nonunion employees would be furloughed -- required to take paid or unpaid time off -- for those two weeks. Union employees in most cases would not be allowed to work and earn pay, either.

    However, if the Department of Energy moves ahead with reprogramming money in the fiscal 2013 budget, the furloughs might be avoided.