tool name

close
tool goes here

Liquor Control Board proposes 20-mile buffer for small liquor stores

During the 2011 campaign for state liquor privatization, supporters said it would keep liquor out of gas stations, mini-marts and convenience stores. But opponents called voters’ attention to what they called the “mini-mart loophole.” More than 900 small outlets could pop up under that loophole, they claimed, including in places like Seattle and Tacoma.

Published: March 13, 2013 at 1:01 p.m. PDT
0 comments

During the 2011 campaign for state liquor privatization, supporters said it would keep liquor out of gas stations, mini-marts and convenience stores. But opponents called voters’ attention to what they called the “mini-mart loophole.” More than 900 small outlets could pop up under that loophole, they claimed, including in places like Seattle and Tacoma.

As we pointed out at the time, both were exaggerations, but opponents in particular were essentially making up facts. Their conclusion was based on guesswork about what the Liquor Control Board would do.

Today, more than a year later, the liquor board revealed what it wants to do.

The fact is, Initiative 1183 does limit outlets to 10,000 square feet or more — with two notable exceptions. One is for former state stores and contract stores. The other is for areas — “trade areas” in the parlance of the initiative — where no big store has opened.

The board today proposed a definition for trade area that would let those stores set up shop 20 miles or more from existing stores.

That would allow roughly 20 stores, the board figures.

There are 1,428 stores around the state where customers can buy hard liquor, more than four times the 329 that existed before the law passed.

“Access obviously isn’t an issue” statewide, liquor board Chairwoman Sharon Foster said. “But it is an issue in some of these areas that we’re going to try to serve.”

Foster and Ruthann Kurose voted to propose the rule, while Chris Marr was absent. Now a public process starts that will give people the chance to weigh in with written comments through April 24 and a public hearing on that day. The board would finalize the rule on May 1 and it would take effect June 1.

Many stores have applied for licenses that would not qualify under a 20-mile buffer. I’ll update this post with reactions to the proposal.

Read more here: http://blog.thenewstribune.com/politics/2013/03/13/liquor-control-board-proposes-20-mile-buffer-for-small-liquor-stores/

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Liquor Control Board proposes 20-mile buffer for small stores

    The Liquor Control Board on Wednesday finally revealed what it wants to do about the so-called "mini-mart loophole" that opponents of liquor privatization warned in 2011 would cause an explosion of small stores selling hard liquor.

  • Liquor Board to allow more small stores to sell hard liquor

    You shouldn’t have to drive more than 20 miles to buy your whiskey and gin. That’s the idea driving the state Liquor Control Board to let a few more small stores sell hard liquor under the voter-approved privatization scheme that limited most sales to stores 10,000 square feet and bigger.

  • Liquor Control Board sticks with 20-mile restriction on small liquor stores -- with exceptions

    You shouldn’t have to drive more than 20 miles to buy your whiskey and gin.

  • The liquor store hangover

    Early this year when the state put its network of liquor stores on the auction block, many small-business people saw it as their path to prosperity. Now, six months after liquor sales were privatized, many of those once-eager bidders, who collectively paid the state more than $31 million for the rights to the state’s former stores, have discovered their adventures in retailing are a road to ruination.

  • Cracking down on liquor theft

    Now that liquor in Washington has left the relatively secure environment of small network of state stores to become part of the standard merchandise in virtually every grocery, drug and discount store in the state, it does not seem surprising that stories of liquor theft have become commonplace.