tool name

close
tool goes here

Pasco port commissioner questions airport terminal expansion

Port of Pasco Commissioner Jim Klindworth on Thursday raised questions about the port's plans for a $36 million expansion project at the Tri-Cities Airport.

Published: March 14, 2013 at 2:26 p.m. PDTUpdated: March 14, 2013 at 2:35 p.m. PDT
0 comments

Port of Pasco Commissioner Jim Klindworth on Thursday raised questions about the port's plans for a $36 million expansion project at the Tri-Cities Airport in light of federal budget cuts that could affect activity at Hanford.

Klindworth said he supports the expansion in principal and doesn't want to be a "doctor of doom," but has hesitations because of federal budget uncertainty.

"Between the fact the government won't raise our PFCs (passenger facility charges), Congress won't pass a budget and Hanford is most of our business at the airport, I have some differing thoughts on spending this much money," he said. "I think we have to go ahead, but I'm worried if the worst happens in five years."

Jim Toomey, the port's executive director, recommended the commissioners go ahead and formally vote to start the design and adjust plans later if necessary.

He added that if the Federal Aviation Administration would let airports collect $6.50 per airplane passenger instead of the current $4.50, money for the expansion wouldn't be a problem.

"If we had a $6.50 PFC, it would be a no-brainer. It's not," Toomey said.


Looking for something to do around the Tri-Cities? Looking for a way to promote your event for free? Check out the Tri-City Herald's community calendar and restaurant guide.


Report breaking news.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

January 11, 2013 - A proposed $32 million to $36 million redesign project of the Tri-Cities Airport terminal would move the current staircase and restrooms to the front of the building to open up the central area near the security checkpoint. The concept design doubles the terminal's size to about 110,000 square feet. (RICHARD DICKIN/Tri-City Herald)
CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Port of Pasco inspects Green Power warehouse

    Port of Pasco commissioners on Thursday inspected Green Power's warehouse and office building at Big Pasco Industrial park to make sure company owner Michael Spitzauer had cleaned up the building in compliance with his lease.

    Getting the building back in order was one of the conditions of the latest six-month lease port commissioners granted Spitzauer -- after starting to evict him twice before.

    Spitzauer in February handed the port a check for almost $500,000 to pay back rent plus court costs and an increase in the security deposit.

  • Port of Pasco buys 34 acres for possible runway expansion

    The Port of Pasco spent $1.6 million this week to make sure that bigger airplanes someday will be able to land at the Tri-Cities Airport.

    Port commissioners unanimously agreed to buy 34 acres from E.E. Properties so they can expand a main runway if they need to.

    The port already has enough land to lengthen one of the airport's two runways, said Ron Foraker, Tri-Cities Airport director.

  • Pasco's Tri-Cities Airport use declines

    The Tri-Cities Airport record growth in boardings seems to have stalled this year.

  • Tri-City aviators move views on future of Vista Field Airport

    Most Tri-City aviators have moved from supporting an enhanced Vista Field Airport to endorsing a less-expensive airport option after hearing the improvements could cost $42.6 million, Port of Kennewick commissioners heard Tuesday.

    But Michael Mehaffy, project manager with consultant Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co., said the so-called no-action alternative that follows the 2011 airport master plan is something the consultants cannot recommend.

    The firm's recently finished study outlines three options: follow the 2011 Vista Field master plan, invest in a major expansion of the airport and its facilities, or close the airport and develop it for other uses.

  • TRIDEC, chamber of commerce tell Port of Kennewick it should close Vista Field

    Closing Vista Field Airport and redeveloping it appears to be the best option for the Tri-Cities, two more public agencies told the Port of Kennewick on Friday.

    The Tri-City Development Council and the Tri-City Regional Chamber of Commerce sent letters voicing their support for removing the small general aviation airport near the Three Rivers Convention Center in favor of mixed-use development.

    They echoed similar views shared by the Tri-Cities Visitor & Convention Bureau, Kennewick Public Facilities District and West Richland City Council. All said developing the 113 acres associated with Vista Field into something other than an airport was in the best interest of the community.