tool name

close
tool goes here

A chance to get poor adults back to the dentist

Since the Great Recession hit five years ago, the Legislature has had to do dumb things with money – short-term spending cuts that, long term, were bound to cost more money than they saved.

Published: March 18, 2013 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

Since the Great Recession hit five years ago, the Legislature has had to do dumb things with money – short-term spending cuts that, long term, were bound to cost more money than they saved.

One of these forced errors was the elimination of Medicaid dental coverage for 450,000 poor adults two years ago. For every dollar saved, the state forfeited another dollar in federal matching funds – and set itself up for higher medical expenses down the road.

It’s now time to reverse that penny-wise decision. With the Affordable Care Act about to supplement state Medicaid spending with federal, the restoration of dental care would leverage far more federal dollars than it would cost.

Dental infections are like other infections: Let them fester, and the problems only get bigger and more expensive.

After the Medicaid cut in 2011, adults who’d lost their coverage either had to seek charity care or go to the emergency room when they got a toothache.

Pain in the jaws and the teeth can be symptoms of nasty conditions, including abscesses turning into massive bacterial infections. Emergency room staffs can provide painkillers and antibiotics, but they can’t treat the underlying dental diseases.

Diabetes is the best illustration of pay-now-or-pay-more-later.

Gum disease, untreated, wreaks havoc on diabetics. Without dental care, researchers have found that people suffer higher rates of kidney and heart disease, stroke, and blindness.

A broad study released last April estimated that treatment of periodontal disease in diabetics saved an average of $1,814 a year.

Restoring dental coverage for the excluded 450,000 Washingtonians in the next biennium would cost the state an estimated $30.8 million.

That would snag an equal amount from the federal government. It would also leverage 100 percent federal funding for 260,000 more adults who’d be brought into Medicaid next year under the Affordable Care Act. More than 700,000 low-income Washingtonians would wind up with dental insurance they otherwise wouldn’t get.

This country has historically maintained an exaggerated distinction between dental and medical care, as if teeth and jaws somehow didn’t connect to the rest of the body. It’s all health care, though, and the Legislature should grab this opportunity to offer dentistry to Washingtonians with little money..

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Advocates: Restoring preventive dental care for poor could save public money

    Ali Price went to the St. Joseph hospital emergency room twice last summer with pain from an infected tooth that she described as "all-consuming."

    Price, who works providing in-home care for elderly people, doesn't have dental or medical insurance. But she needed to get antibiotics for the infection while she searched for a dentist to save her tooth. The 31-year-old Bellingham resident had already lost two molars and was trying to avoid a third.

    "I didn't want to lose any more teeth," she said.

  • Coalition pushes for Medicaid dental restoration

    Dentistry professionals hope the end of the state legislative session and the reconciliation of the 2013-15 budget will resolve the cuts made in 2011 to Medicaid coverage for nearly 450,000 uninsured low-income adults.

  • In health care overhaul, states face critical choice on Medicaid

    President Barack Obama thinks his health care law makes states an offer they can't refuse. Whether to expand Medicaid, the federal-state program for the poor and disabled, could be the most important decision facing governors and legislatures this year. The repercussions go beyond their budgets, directly affecting the well-being of residents and the finances of critical hospitals.

  • State weighs expanding Medicaid

    Washington officials are moving ahead quickly to set up a new health insurance marketplace where the uninsured can start buying health plans later this year. But one other major element of Obamacare – the expansion of Medicaid to cover more of the state’s poorest people – is high-centered in the Legislature.

  • Lawmakers consider expanding Medicaid

    Washington officials are moving ahead quickly to set up a new health insurance marketplace where the uninsured can start buying health plans later this year. But one other major element of Obamacare, the expansion of Medicaid to cover more of the state’s poorest people, is high-centered in the Legislature.