tool name

close
tool goes here

Some faint signs of life in the Republican Party?

At first glance, last week’s Conservative Political Action Conference looked like a hot mess. On closer inspection, it looked even worse.

Published: March 19, 2013 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

At first glance, last week’s Conservative Political Action Conference looked like a hot mess. On closer inspection, it looked even worse.

Difficult though it might be, however, progressives should resist the urge to gloat. CPAC might have been a disaster, but the Republican Party is showing faint signs of brain activity and a fluttering pulse.

Oh, what the heck, let’s gloat just a little. The conservative movement’s annual group therapy session often takes place well outside the political mainstream, but this year it was in some parallel dimension, perhaps down a rabbit hole.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, defined the gathering: “If standing for liberty and standing for the Constitution makes you a wacko bird, then count me a proud wacko bird. And I think there are more than a few other wacko birds gathered here today.”

I’ll say. From all the screeching and squawking, you’d think the National Harbor convention complex on the banks of the Potomac River had been converted into a wacko bird rookery.

Here was a preening Sarah Palin, cracking one-liners and making an unconvincing case for her continued relevance. There was a strutting Donald Trump, delivering a stream-of-semi-consciousness monologue to a half-empty room.

Newt Gingrich performed his party trick of seeming both visionary and hallucinatory in the same speech. “You’re going to hear a false attack that we don’t need new ideas,” he said. “Let me draw a distinction. We don’t need new principles. ... We do need ideas.”

All well and good - but he tried to illustrate his point with a candle he had brought on stage and a history lesson about the invention of the light bulb. In the end, not very illuminating.

Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., sounded like one of those benighted people Gingrich was talking about. “We don’t need a new idea,” he told the crowd. “There is an idea. The idea is called America, and it still works.”

To the extent that Rubio’s words meant anything at all, they belied the fact that he has been working mightily to infect the GOP with new ideas about immigration. His whole speech tried to have it both ways – change but don’t change, and God bless America. If Rubio wants to be president, I don’t think Mitt Romney is the model to emulate.

Speaking of whom, yes, Romney was there, making his post-election debut as a Republican elder statesman. Speaking to conservative true believers who once derided him as a “Massachusetts moderate,” he totally brought down the house.

He was warm, funny, self-deprecating – all the things that as a candidate he was not. Perhaps most endearing was that he didn’t have much of anything to say, beyond encouragement to keep the faith. Many other speakers didn’t even mention him.

Jeb Bush made the sensible argument that the GOP cannot continue to write off the segment of the population that Romney famously called the “47 percent.”

Bush told the crowd, “Here’s reality: If you’re fortunate enough to count yourself among the privileged, the rest of the nation is drowning. In our country today, if you’re born poor, if your parents didn’t go to college, if you don’t know your father, if English isn’t spoken at home, then the odds are stacked against you.” The speech received polite but tepid applause.

At least Bush fared better than another prominent moderate – New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, presently the most popular Republican in the country – who wasn’t even invited.

The presidential straw poll conducted at the end of the conference was won by Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., king of the “wacko birds” – the disparaging reference is Sen. John McCain’s, not mine. Paul’s speech included what sounded like a direct retort to the veteran Arizona Republican: “The GOP of old has grown stale and moss-covered. I don’t think we need to name any names, do we?”

Yes, stale. Obviously, dripping with moss. But outside of the CPAC echo chamber, there are signs of life.

Thanks largely to Rubio and Bush – and to exit polls from the November election – there is a lively debate within the party about immigration reform. Thanks largely to Paul, there’s a debate about defense spending. Thanks to the switch by Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, there’s a debate about same-sex marriage. Was any of this conceivable even six months ago?

All this ferment tells me that someday the GOP will claw its way to the right side of history. Progressives had better be ready with some new ideas of their own.

Eugene Robinson is a Pulitzer Prize-winning Washington Post columnist. Email him at eugenerobinson@ washpost.com.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • Tea party vs. old guard in GOP Senate rift

    A long-simmering feud between establishment Republicans and tea partyers broke into full view, with Sen. John McCain accusing younger colleagues of overplaying their hands and tempting Democrats to change Senate rules that protect the minority party.

  • Come 2016, Sen. Rand Paul could be the anti-Rubio choice for tea party faithful

    Sens. Marco Rubio’s and Rand Paul’s delivery of back-to-back rebuttals of President Barack Obama’s speech to Congress – Rubio as the Republican response, Paul as the tea party rejoinder – raises some tantalizing questions:

  • The Republican Party begins the introspection process

    No political party enjoys losing an election, but a healthy party reacts to defeat – after a suitable period of grieving – by trying to figure out what went wrong.

  • Analysis: Immigration plans from Rubio, Obama are very similar

    The White House has said Florida Sen. Marco Rubio’s immigration plans, which could legalize the status of some of those unlawfully in the country, "bode well for a productive, bipartisan debate." A reason for that optimism: Rubio’s ideas and comments closely mirror those of President Obama in a 2011 policy speech in El Paso Texas.

  • Sens. Marco Rubio, Rand Paul deliver blistering rebuttals to Obama

    In English and Spanish, Republican Sen. Marco Rubio on Tuesday night delivered a scathing rebuke of President Barack Obama’s State of the Union speech, signaling a Republican battle for middle-class voters that could help re-energize his party and also propel a potential 2016 White House run.