tool name

close
tool goes here

US military can't seem to solve its sexual assault problem

The best nominated film not to win an Oscar this year is “The Invisible War,” a riveting account of sexual assault in the military focusing on the elite Marine barracks in Washington, D.C., just blocks from the White House and a bridge away from the Pentagon.

Published: March 22, 2013 at 12:05 a.m. PDT
0 comments

The best nominated film not to win an Oscar this year is “The Invisible War,” a riveting account of sexual assault in the military focusing on the elite Marine barracks in Washington, D.C., just blocks from the White House and a bridge away from the Pentagon.

With harrowing interviews of those preyed upon, the documentary shows what little recourse victims have, how reprisals are more likely than justice, and how perpetrators are as likely to get promoted as to get charged.

Two of those interviewed filed lawsuits against the military over an atmosphere that tolerates rapists while quieting the survivors.

The sequel to the documentary played out last week in Congress as the Senate Armed Services Committee’s Subcommittee on Personnel tried to make the invisible visible. In its first hearings since an inquiry into the Air Force Academy scandal in 2003, the committee had a fresh case to consider.

Lt. Col. James Wilkerson, a former fighter pilot at Aviano Air Base in Italy was accused of sexual assault after a late-night party at his house in March 2012.

At trial, Wilkerson, who didn’t take the stand, was convicted, sentenced to a year in prison and dismissed from the Air Force. Then last month his commanding officer, Lt. Gen. Craig Franklin, overturned the conviction, clearing Wilkerson’s record and returning him to duty.

The subcommittee heard from four former service members who found themselves endangered not by the enemy but from their own. Former Army Sgt. Rebekah Havrilla testified that she was raped by a fellow service member in Afghanistan and told by an Army chaplain that it was God’s way of getting her to go back to church.

She didn’t press charges until she found out that her assailant had posted pictures of her on a pornographic website. Then the married officer said the sex was consensual, and officials in his chain of command decided not to charge him with the assault (or adultery).

One of the more poignant moments was the testimony of Brian Lewis, a burly former Navy petty officer, who wanted to expose the problem in the shadows: men attacking men. He told about being raped by a superior while serving in Guam. He was the first man ever to testify before Congress on the subject, despite estimates that more than half the violence is committed by men on men.

When the subject is violence in the military, those in charge are always horrified and determined to do something: Tailhook in 1991, the Aberdeen Proving Ground in 1996, the Air Force Academy in 2003. Now, with more women in the military and in Congress, things are looking up.

Is there anything more sad or horrible than young recruits going off to basic training and being attacked by their drill instructors? That was happening with frequency at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, but as of January, some 59 recruits are seeing justice done as 32 drill instructors have been prosecuted or are under investigation.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., chairman of the subcommittee, pinpointed the problem: Commanders can’t be left to police their own ranks.

Just as the Roman Catholic bishops did with priests who abused children, officers are more likely to shield the perpetrator they know than the victim they don’t.

Former Defense Secretary Leon Panetta realized that in April 2012 when he saw “The Invisible War”: Two days later, he ordered that all sexual assault cases be handled by senior officers with the rank of colonel or higher.

Justice may not come, in fact, until these cases are removed from the military system entirely and handled by civilians.

In the Wilkerson case, the victim got further than those who testified last week. She got before a panel of officers, who weighed the evidence and the credibility of witnesses and found the defendant guilty. It didn’t matter. With his signature, Franklin overturned the verdict.

Similar cases abound. One military expert testified that such absolute power in the hands of officers is necessary to maintain military order and discipline. But is an atmosphere in which more than 3,000 assaults are reported yearly (although the Pentagon estimates that 19,000 occur) orderly and disciplined?

The Wilkerson case is worth a movie all its own. If you doubt the system is cockeyed, consider this: Even Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel can’t overrule Franklin. As one of his first official acts, Hagel ordered a review of that policy.

Margaret Carlson is a Bloomberg View columnist.

JOIN THE DISCUSSION | Register here

We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service. If you have any questions, including why your comment may not be showing immediately after you submit it, be sure to visit the commenting FAQ.

PHOTOS
CONTESTS

Similar stories

  • House panel moves to curb military sexual assaults

    Members of a House panel angry over sexual abuse problems in the military are set to vote on a bill that would strip commanding officers of their authority to unilaterally change or dismiss court-martial convictions - a change that lawmakers believe will lead to a cultural shift that encourages more victims to step forward.

  • America’s military injustice can’t be perpetuated

    Along with a boosted Buick LeSabre, another incident listed on a crime report Sunday in Arlington County, Va., was a creepy attack by a man on a woman.

  • Obama, lawmakers tackle military sexual assault

    In a one-two punch from both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue on Thursday, lawmakers introduced a sweeping revision to military sexual-assault law and the president summoned his uniformed service chiefs. The politically popular bill and the high-profile White House meeting underscore how recent cases and reports have rapidly turned combating military sexual assault into a bipartisan high priority.

  • Crackdown on military sex assault may have unintended consequences

    The scales of military justice might tilt as the Pentagon, Congress and the White House mobilize against sexual assault among the troops. Put another way, it will get tougher for defendants; maybe, some fear, unlawfully so. “What we are seeing now is the complete politicization of military justice in a way that would have shocked the members of Congress who passed the Uniform Code of Military Justice,” said Marine Corps Reserves Maj. Babu Kaza, a prominent military attorney.

  • Lawmakers, White House discuss sexual assault

    Congressional efforts to combat sexual assault in the military secured the support of the Obama administration as senior White House officials met privately Thursday with a bipartisan group of lawmakers.