With UW alum Jim Mora staying at UCLA, Huskies' search continues

With UW alum Jim Mora staying at UCLA, Huskies focus on other coaching candidates

christian.caple@thenewstribune.comDecember 4, 2013 

The Washington Huskies’ search for a football coach will move on without Jim Mora.

Mora, who is finishing his second season at UCLA, agreed Tuesday to a six-year contract extension through the 2019 season.

UCLA announced the extension just as Steve Sarkisian was being formally introduced as USC’s new coach. Sarkisian left UW on Monday after compiling a 34-29 record in nearly five seasons as the Huskies coach.

A report Monday night by Football Scoop – an outlet specializing in coaching news – indicated that Washington athletic director Scott Woodward had spoken with Mora about the job. That leverage is likely what provided the impetus for UCLA to put together a new deal for Mora, who, according to the Los Angeles Times, was also promised that his assistant coaches will receive pay raises.

Mora was a walk-on defensive back and linebacker at UW from 1980-83, and has spoken openly in the past about his desire to coach at UW.

With Mora out of the picture, the Huskies have a few obvious options, though neither Woodward nor any UW official will comment publicly about whom the school is considering.

Justin Wilcox, UW’s current defensive coordinator, could be a candidate if the Huskies choose not to pursue a sitting head coach. Reports suggest Sarkisian wants to take Wilcox with him to USC, but logic seems to dictate that

if Wilcox were contacted by UW about the head coaching position, he would have to engage.

Another intriguing coordinator candidate is Doug Nussmeier, the offensive coordinator at Alabama. He coached under Sarkisian for three seasons at UW and is considered one of the nation’s top assistant coaches.

ESPN.com’s Joe Schad reported Monday that Boise State coach Chris Petersen is still expected to be a part of the process. Petersen, who is in his eighth season as the Broncos’ coach, was reportedly in the running for the USC job before he withdrew.

The name of Missouri coach Gary Pinkel was bound to surface as a candidate from the most optimistic of Huskies fans – he played for former UW coach Don James at Kent State in the early 1970s, then coached under James as an assistant at UW from 1979-90.

Pinkel was a finalist for the vacant UW job in 1998 when the Huskies instead hired Rick Neuheisel. But any Pinkel-to-UW talk this time around seems more like a pipe dream; Pinkel has the Tigers sitting at 11-1 heading into this week’s Southeastern Conference championship game, and at age 61 seems unlikely to leave what he’s built at Missouri.

Pinkel declined comment about the UW job when asked by CBS Sports on Tuesday.

SARK EXPLAINS HIMSELF

The scene in Los Angeles on Tuesday mimicked, in some ways, the scene inside the Don James Center on Dec. 8, 2008, the day Sarkisian was introduced as UW’s coach.

Reporters. Athletic department big-wigs. Smiles and talk of championships. Except this time, Sarkisian and his family were dressed in USC colors as he was introduced as the Trojans’ new coach.

During his introductory press conference, Sarkisian was asked about an interview he gave KJR-AM’s Mitch Levy on Monday morning when he said he’d spoken with USC, but had not formally interviewed for the job.

As it turns out, Sarkisian had met with USC athletic director Pat Haden on Sunday afternoon, and Haden decided to hire Sarkisian when he returned home to Los Angeles that night. Contract negotiations took place Monday morning.

But during his radio appearance, Sarkisian didn’t characterize that Sunday meeting as an interview, saying: “I didn’t interview for the job. They reached out to me. I talked to them. I’m not anywhere near on the course of taking that job or not.”

A few hours later, reports surfaced that he had taken the job, and USC officially announced it after Sarkisian met with UW players at 2 p.m.

In retrospect, Sarkisian said he wishes he had been more forthcoming.

“Hindsight’s 20-20. I probably should have said it was an interview,” he said, adding that he withheld that information in an attempt to protect his players. “Semantics are semantics. I probably shouldn’t have referred to it as ‘talked to.’ If I could do it all over again, I probably would have just said exactly what the conversation was that Pat and I had.

“I’m sorry if my message got misconstrued, but it really was in the interest of the young men.”

christian.caple@thenewstribune.com blog.thenewstribune.com/uwsports @ChristianCaple

The News Tribune is pleased to provide this opportunity to share information, experiences and observations about what's in the news. Some of the comments may be reprinted elsewhere in the site or in the newspaper. We encourage lively, open debate on the issues of the day, and ask that you refrain from profanity, hate speech, personal comments and remarks that are off point. Thank you for taking the time to offer your thoughts.

Commenting FAQs | Terms of Service