ELECTIONS: Attorneys don’t run for bench out of fear for livelihood
Patrick O’Callahan (Inside Opinion blog, 10-29) wondered if there is some unspoken Emily Post rule that more or less forbids lawyers to run against seated judges. Let me suggest the much more pragmatic reason that I heard lawyers voice in the town where I used to live: fear of losing the election and then losing cases – and money and one’s livelihood – when facing that judge in his courtroom.
I served for 20-plus years as a councilman in a Midwestern town of 27,000 people. I ran against and beat 15- and 30-year incumbents. Moral: If teed off enough with a politician, run against him. And beat him.
Comments
JOIN THE DISCUSSION
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service.
Comments are displayed newest first. If you would like to read a thread from beginning to end, select "Oldest first" from the drop down menu.
We welcome comments. Please keep them civil, short and to the point. ALL CAPS, spam, obscene, profane, abusive and off topic comments will be deleted. Repeat offenders will be blocked. Thanks for taking part — and abiding by these simple rules. A thorough explanation of rules of conduct can be found in our Terms of Service.
Comments are displayed newest first. If you would like to read a thread from beginning to end, select "Oldest first" from the drop down menu.
|
|
|



Comments


