A quick note at 11:04: I'm having some computer issues, apparently I somehow deleted the postgame reaction blog and this post was put in it's place.
So I go to watch Montana play a basketball game at UW, and I come back and there is a bunch of comments about thisreport
Never miss a local story.
from Pro Football Weekly saying that GM Tim Ruskell will not be retained next year.
I should have had it up earlier, that's my fault.
Look, PFW is a respected publication. But there is no by-line on the story and it's based on inside sources. You get a little nervous about giving something like this too much play.
So I guess posting the link and allowing the speculation or debate is fine. But until we get something confirmed either way, I guess you have to only look at it as a rumor.
How much credulity do you give this?
Most of you can rattle off a lengthy list of reasons why Ruskell should be out as a GM. I'm one of those people, but I'd be curious to wonder, what, if any reasons you could find for him to be brought back.