Despite having robust GI Bill education benefits, hundreds — perhaps thousands — of student veterans contend they were deceived into racking up federal loan debt through abusive practices of certain for-profit colleges.
On Tuesday, the students, along with thousands of non-veterans, gained an easier path to loan forgiveness from a federal court ruling in Washington, D.C.
U.S. District Judge Randolph D. Moss dismissed legal arguments from an association of for-profit colleges, which succeeded for more than a year in blocking Obama administration rules to bring financial relief to defrauded student borrowers and to strengthen federal protections against deceptive school practices.
The Trump administration’s Department of Education also had fought the Obama reforms until a month ago, when the same judge rejected legal arguments from Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and administration attorneys.
Premium content for only $0.99
For the most comprehensive local coverage, subscribe today.
In that case, two student-borrowers and a coalition of 19 states and the District of Columbia filed separate lawsuits to invalidate the department’s stay order on Obama loan rules, which had been set to take effect in July 2017. Moss called the Trump team’s effort to protect for-profit schools and avoid billions of dollars in loan forgiveness for borrowers “arbitrary and capricious.”
Together the dual rulings force DeVos, who still contends the Obama rules are too expansive, to implement them even as her department prepares more stringent regulations.
Given the statutory schedule for rule-making, the DeVos rules can’t take effect before July 2020, the department confirmed. That creates a window for borrowers with loan debt tied to fraudulent or deceptive schools to apply for relief under more liberal rules in effect from the Oct. 16 court decision.
The department likely must update information on filing borrower defense claims. Here’s a link to what’s available now: bit.ly/29bNJUs
Obama’s Education Department designed its rules to better protect student borrowers against misleading and predatory practices by post-secondary institutions; to clarify a process for federal loan forgiveness in cases of institutional misconduct; to allow group actions to replace thousands of individual loan forgiveness claims, and to hold for-profit colleges accountable for harmful practices.
The department decided its 20-year-old regulation on so-called “borrower defense claims” needed updating after a deluge of claims from students with federal loans following closure of a mega for-profit enterprise, Corinthian Colleges, in April 2015.
The 1995 regulation, officials found, lacked detail on how students should submit and how the department should adjudicate a tsunami of loan relief requests. The old rule also limited eligibility for loan forgiveness to borrowers in default.
Obama officials released their final regulations in November 2016. They were to take effect the following July but the California Association of Postsecondary Schools sued to block them.
A supportive DeVos quickly announced she would block the Obama rules and prepare new ones to reflect concerns of for-profit schools and to protect taxpayers from automatic forgiveness of billions of dollars in federal student loans associated with failed for-profit colleges.
Consumer advocacy groups for students, including veterans, praised Moss’s recent rulings.
“It’s really positive news,” said Walter Ochinko,research director for Veterans Education Success (VES), an advocacy group formed to protect veterans and their education benefits from fraud and deceptive practices.
The Obama rules went into effect at noon Oct. 16 and are to be implemented immediately. “But the devil is in the details,” Ochinko said. The judge didn’t give the department detailed instructions on how to implement the many provisions.
“It’s so easy for an administration that doesn’t want to implement something not to do it,” Ochinko said. “We’ll just have to see how it plays out. … Advocacy groups will be watching very closely.”
He contends the processing of borrower defense claims by the department “grounded to a halt” during the first half of the Trump administration, a slowdown that can’t entirely be blamed on having old rules in place.
But Tuesday’s court ruling creates “a window of opportunity that’s going to last until July 2020 to apply for loan forgiveness under terms much more favorable to the student than if the [DeVos alternative] had gone into effect.”
The Education Department has been criticized for not doing enough to inform students about borrower defense claims. The number of student veterans who might be eligible isn’t known, Ochinko said. The VES data base holds 4,000 complaints of deceptive practices by for-profits schools.
“Certainly, many of those veterans will be eligible,” he said. “How many have applied [already] I don’t know.”
As part of the Forever GI Bill law enacted in August 2017, veterans who used Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits at for-profit schools that suddenly closed, leaving them with worthless credits or degrees, have seen those education benefits restored.
The new Education Department rules provide additional protections. A key feature of the Obama rules will allow certain borrower defense applicants not only to have loan balances forgiven but also be reimbursed for loan amounts already paid.
That might be relevant for someone like former Marine Sgt. Jonathan Ngowaki
He enrolled in DeVry University in 2010 seeking a business degree. He said he assumed his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefit would cover all costs, so he resisted a push from DeVry’s financial aid office to complete a financial aid application. Finally, he relented when told it was a requirement for enrollment.
Soon, he received a $5,000 check, which a woman in DeVry’s financial aid office said was grant money.
“I kept telling her, ‘I don’t need the money,” Ngowaki said.
By his third semester he got a lender notice, and realized he was $15,000 in debt with direct federal student loans. The money made life easier but he didn’t need it for education costs, Ngowaki said, and ordered the loan arrangement stopped.
His theory is that DeVry wasn’t confident, as the Post-9/11 GI Bill began, whether student payments would arrive on schedule. Perhaps to ensure steady cash flow it pushed student veterans into federal loans. DeVry in time helped Ngowaki with some debt, he said, but most of the $15,000 he repaid himself.
Whether and how the new regulations might deliver more loan relief to a veteran like Ngowaki is still unclear, Ochinko said.
Many student veterans end up needing loans because they haven’t served long enough on active duty to qualify for full Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits. The loans become bad investments if for-profit schools close or don’t provide promised degrees or transferable credits, or if employers don’t view the degrees as desirable.
One attorney for student plaintiffs who helped unleash the Obama rules, Adam R. Pulver, said an Obama change resisted by for-profit schools bans them from requiring students to accept arbitration in settling all complaints.
“It’s been pretty much exclusive to for-profit schools that to enroll you have to sign an agreement to arbitrate all disputes,” and the agreements often state that students “can’t file a class action lawsuit,” Ochinko said. “The problems of for-profit schools would have come to light a lot sooner had people been able to sue.”
Another key feature of the Obama rules would require for-profit schools facing financial risk to show a letter of credit and to make cash deposits with the Education Department as they set off various financial responsibility alarms, so taxpayers are not as deeply exposed by loan claims when for-profit schools fail.